Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985:61 Suppl 3:108-14.

Propofol ('Diprivan') for outpatient cystoscopy. Efficacy and recovery compared with althesin and methohexitone

  • PMID: 3877277
Comparative Study

Propofol ('Diprivan') for outpatient cystoscopy. Efficacy and recovery compared with althesin and methohexitone

B Kay et al. Postgrad Med J. 1985.

Abstract

In two non-concurrent investigations, propofol was compared with methohexitone and with Althesin as an intravenous anaesthetic for cystoscopy in outpatients. In the comparison between propofol and methohexitone the 60 patients also received alfentanil in similar dosage; in comparison with Althesin (43 patients) the Cremophor formulation of propofol was used. During induction of anaesthesia propofol caused fewer excitatory effects than either methohexitone or Althesin, and less pain than methohexitone. There was no difference in the incidence of apnoea caused by propofol 1.5 mg/kg and Althesin 0.05 ml/kg, or propofol 2 mg/kg and methohexitone 1.5 mg/kg. Induction of anaesthesia by propofol was faster than that by Althesin. The use of alfentanil 7 micrograms/kg at induction of anaesthesia apparently increases the incidence of apnoea seen at that time and during maintenance of anaesthesia, but an overall dose of approximately 1 mg reduces the mean dose of propofol required from 0.459 mg/kg/min to 0.192 mg/kg/min and improves the quality of anaesthesia. During maintenance of anaesthesia propofol produced less myoclonia and movement than Althesin, and fewer hiccups than methohexitone, but the mean minimum systolic arterial pressure observed in the propofol group was less than that seen in the methohexitone group. Immediate recovery of consciousness was faster and better after propofol than methohexitone, and fewer complications were seen after propofol than Althesin. Recovery of coordination and perception, tested by the digit substitution test, was faster after propofol than methohexitone. Exact comparisons of recovery of ocular tone (Maddox Wing test) between the anaesthetics were not possible as both Althesin and methohexitone rendered some patients incapable of taking the tests in the early post-operative period. In response to a take-home questionnaire, patients stated that they were drowsy for a shorter time, and ate earlier after propofol than after methohexitone. No patient who received propofol vomited or was nauseated and all would wish to receive the same anaesthesia again. The studies suggest that propofol is preferable to both Althesin and methohexitone for intravenous anaesthesia for cystoscopy in outpatients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources