Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 21;17(1):144.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06750-7.

Managers' attitudes to depression and the association with their rating of how work capacity is affected in employees with common mental disorders

Affiliations

Managers' attitudes to depression and the association with their rating of how work capacity is affected in employees with common mental disorders

Jenny Hultqvist et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Objective: This explorative, cross-sectional study assessed the association between managers' attitudes to employee depression and their rating of how common mental disorders (CMDs) affect employee work capacity.

Results: A principal component analysis was performed for the nine variables concerning managers' rating of how CMDs can affect work capacity among employees. The analysis resulted in two factors: task-oriented- and relational work capacity. The result of the multivariate analysis of covariance showed a p value of 0.014 (Pillai's trace) indicating a statistically significant association between managers' attitudes towards employee depression and managers' rating of how CMDs affect work capacity. The association was significant for both factors as indicated by the p value of 0.024 for task-oriented work capacity and the p value of 0.007 for relational work capacity. The R2 value was 0.022 for task-oriented work capacity and 0.017 for relational work capacity. We assumed that negative attitudes towards employee depression would be associated with a perception of decreased work capacity among employees with CMDs. The results showed a significant association; however, the effect (~ 2%) was small. Further studies of manager's attitudes and other possible determinants of managers' rating of CMD-related work capacity are needed to better understand these factors.

Keywords: Attitudes; Common mental disorder; Employee; Manager; Work capacity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for selection of the study population of Swedish managers. Data was collected in 2017

Similar articles

References

    1. Henshaw JL, Gaffney SH, Madl AK, Paustenbach DJ. The employer’s responsibility to maintain a safe and healthful work environment: an historical review of societal expectations and industrial practices. Empl Responsibilities Rights J. 2007;19:173–92. doi: 10.1007/s10672-007-9044-0. - DOI
    1. Lerner D, Henke RM. What does research tell us about depression, job performance, and work productivity? J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:401–10. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31816bae50. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harvey SB, Henderson M, Lelliott P, Hotopf M. Mental health and employment: much work still to be done. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194(3):201–3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.055111. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tengelin E, Hensing G, Holmgren K, Ståhl C, Bertilsson M. Swedish managers’ experience-based understanding of the capacity to work in employees with Common Mental disorders: a Focus Group Study. J Occup Rehabil. 2022;32:685–96. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10029-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin A, Woods M, Dawkins S. How managers experience situations involving employee mental ill-health. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2018;11:442–63. doi: 10.1108/IJWHM-09-2017-0069. - DOI