Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 22;25(1):63.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8.

A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa

Kingsley Orievulu  1   2   3 , Alex Hinga  4 , Busisiwe Nkosi  5   6 , Nothando Ngwenya  5   7 , Janet Seeley  5   7   8 , Anthony Akanlu  9 , Paulina Tindana  10 , Sassy Molyneux  4   11 , Samson Kinyanjui  4   11 , Dorcas Kamuya  4   11
Affiliations

A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa

Kingsley Orievulu et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic forced governments, multilateral public health organisations and research institutions to undertake research quickly to inform their responses to the pandemic. Most COVID-19-related studies required swift approval, creating ethical and practical challenges for regulatory authorities and researchers. In this paper, we examine the landscape of ethics review processes in Africa during public health emergencies (PHEs).

Methods: We searched four electronic databases (Web of Science, PUBMED, MEDLINE Complete, and CINAHL) to identify articles describing ethics review processes during public health emergencies and/or pandemics. We selected and reviewed those articles that were focused on Africa. We charted the data from the retrieved articles including the authors and year of publication, title, country and disease(s) reference, broad areas of (ethical) consideration, paper type, and approach.

Results: Of an initial 4536 records retrieved, we screened the titles and abstracts of 1491 articles, and identified 72 articles for full review. Nine articles were selected for inclusion. Of these nine articles, five referenced West African countries including Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, and experiences linked to the Ebola virus disease. Two articles focused on South Africa and Kenya, while the other two articles discussed more general experiences and pitfalls of ethics review during PHEs in Africa more broadly. We found no articles published on ethics review processes in Africa before the 2014 Ebola outbreak, and only a few before the COVID-19 outbreak. Although guidelines on protocol review and approval processes for PHEs were more frequently discussed after the 2014 Ebola outbreak, these did not focus on Africa specifically.

Conclusions: There is a gap in the literature about ethics review processes and preparedness within Africa during PHEs. This paper underscores the importance of these processes to inform practices that facilitate timely, context-relevant research that adequately recognises and reinforces human dignity within the quest to advance scientific knowledge about diseases. This is important to improve fast responses to PHEs, reduce mortality and morbidity, and enhance the quality of care before, during, and after pandemics.

Keywords: COVID-19; Ebola virus disease; Ethics review; Pandemic research; Public health emergency; Research ethics committee; Scoping review; Sub-saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flowchart of Study selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 weekly epidemiological update, edition 115, 26 October 2022. 2022.
    1. Xafis V, Schaefer GO, Labude MK, Zhu YJ, Hsu L. The Perfect Moral Storm: diverse ethical considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020;12(2):65–83. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00125-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aarons D. Research in epidemic and emergency situations: a model for collaboration and expediting ethics review in two Caribbean countries. Dev World Bioeth. 2018;18(4):375–84. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12157. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aarons D. Addressing the challenge for expedient ethical review of research in disasters and disease outbreaks. Bioethics. 2019;33(3):343–6. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12543. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Ethical standards for research during public health emergencies: distilling existing guidance to support COVID-19 R&D. Geneva: WHO; 2020.

Publication types