Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 21:10:20552076241257014.
doi: 10.1177/20552076241257014. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Evaluating the performance of an AI-powered VBAC prediction system within a decision-aid birth choice platform for shared decision-making

Affiliations

Evaluating the performance of an AI-powered VBAC prediction system within a decision-aid birth choice platform for shared decision-making

Cherng Chia Yang et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is generally regarded as a safe and viable birthing option for most women with prior cesarean delivery. Nonetheless, concerns about heightened risks of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes have often dissuaded women from considering VBAC. This study aimed to assess the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered VBAC prediction system integrated into a decision-aid birth choice platform for shared decision-making (SDM).

Materials and methods: Employing a retrospective design, we collected medical records from a regional hospital in northern Taiwan from January 2019 to May 2023. To explore a suitable model for tabular data, we compared two prevailing modeling approaches: tree-based models and logistic regression models. We subjected the tree-based algorithm, CatBoost, to binary classification.

Results: Forty pregnant women with 347 records were included. The CatBoost model demonstrated a robust performance, boasting an accuracy rate of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.94) and an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93), surpassing both regression models and other boosting techniques. CatBoost captured the data characteristics on the significant impact of gravidity and the positive influence of previous vaginal birth, reinforcing established clinical guidelines, as substantiated by the SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis.

Conclusion: Using AI techniques offers a more accurate assessment of VBAC risks, boosting women's confidence in selecting VBAC as a viable birthing option. The seamless integration of AI prediction systems with SDM platforms holds a promising potential for enhancing the effectiveness of clinical applications in the domain of women's healthcare.

Keywords: Vaginal birth after cesarean; artificial intelligence prediction; elective repeat cesarean delivery; pregnant women; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Web-based decision-aid platform comprising four components: The Interactive Web Service (IWS) facilitated shares decision-making between doctors and pregnant women and provides decision aids. The platform uses Responsive Web Design (RWD) to ensure optimal performance on personal computers, tablets, and mobile devices. The RWD also supports the storage of pregnant women's medical history and physiological data, which are achieved through integration with the VBAC database system on a cloud server. The VBAC prediction system utilizes cloud-based AI technology to compute and employ a predictive model that determines the probability of a successful vaginal birth during pregnancy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
AI prediction with medical record form and ML model.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Recruitment flow chart for the AI model.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Confusion matrix for every ML model, including logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, decision tree, and CatBoost. 0: VBAC failure group. 1: VBAC success group.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
ROC curve for the performance evaluation at every ML model, including logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, decision tree, and CatBoost.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Feature importance based on SHAP for every ML model, including logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, decision tree, and CatBoost.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joseph Nggada B. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) [Internet]. In: New aspects in cesarean sections. USA: IntechOpen, 2023, pp.1–19.
    1. İzbudak G, Tozkır E, Cogendez E, et al. Comparison of maternal–neonatal results of vaginal birth after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery. Ginekol Pol 2021; 92: 306–311. - PubMed
    1. Osterman MJ. Changes in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: United States, 2016–2021 Vital statistics rapid release; No 21. National Center for Health Statistics, 2022.
    1. Deng B, Li Y, Chen J-Y, et al. Prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2022; 135: 1–11. - PubMed
    1. Black N, Henderson I, Al Wattar BH, et al. Predictive models for estimating the probability of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140: 821–841. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources