Evaluating the performance of an AI-powered VBAC prediction system within a decision-aid birth choice platform for shared decision-making
- PMID: 38778867
- PMCID: PMC11110514
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076241257014
Evaluating the performance of an AI-powered VBAC prediction system within a decision-aid birth choice platform for shared decision-making
Abstract
Background: Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is generally regarded as a safe and viable birthing option for most women with prior cesarean delivery. Nonetheless, concerns about heightened risks of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes have often dissuaded women from considering VBAC. This study aimed to assess the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered VBAC prediction system integrated into a decision-aid birth choice platform for shared decision-making (SDM).
Materials and methods: Employing a retrospective design, we collected medical records from a regional hospital in northern Taiwan from January 2019 to May 2023. To explore a suitable model for tabular data, we compared two prevailing modeling approaches: tree-based models and logistic regression models. We subjected the tree-based algorithm, CatBoost, to binary classification.
Results: Forty pregnant women with 347 records were included. The CatBoost model demonstrated a robust performance, boasting an accuracy rate of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.94) and an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93), surpassing both regression models and other boosting techniques. CatBoost captured the data characteristics on the significant impact of gravidity and the positive influence of previous vaginal birth, reinforcing established clinical guidelines, as substantiated by the SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis.
Conclusion: Using AI techniques offers a more accurate assessment of VBAC risks, boosting women's confidence in selecting VBAC as a viable birthing option. The seamless integration of AI prediction systems with SDM platforms holds a promising potential for enhancing the effectiveness of clinical applications in the domain of women's healthcare.
Keywords: Vaginal birth after cesarean; artificial intelligence prediction; elective repeat cesarean delivery; pregnant women; shared decision making.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Joseph Nggada B. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) [Internet]. In: New aspects in cesarean sections. USA: IntechOpen, 2023, pp.1–19.
-
- İzbudak G, Tozkır E, Cogendez E, et al. Comparison of maternal–neonatal results of vaginal birth after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery. Ginekol Pol 2021; 92: 306–311. - PubMed
-
- Osterman MJ. Changes in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: United States, 2016–2021 Vital statistics rapid release; No 21. National Center for Health Statistics, 2022.
-
- Deng B, Li Y, Chen J-Y, et al. Prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2022; 135: 1–11. - PubMed
-
- Black N, Henderson I, Al Wattar BH, et al. Predictive models for estimating the probability of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140: 821–841. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
