Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 18:19:4465-4493.
doi: 10.2147/IJN.S443117. eCollection 2024.

ULK1 Mediated Autophagy-Promoting Effects of Rutin-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles Contribute to the Activation of NF-κB Signaling Besides Inhibiting EMT in Hep3B Hepatoma Cells

Affiliations

ULK1 Mediated Autophagy-Promoting Effects of Rutin-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles Contribute to the Activation of NF-κB Signaling Besides Inhibiting EMT in Hep3B Hepatoma Cells

Peng Wu et al. Int J Nanomedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Liver cancer remains to be one of the leading causes of cancer worldwide. The treatment options face several challenges and nanomaterials have proven to improve the bioavailability of several drug candidates and their applications in nanomedicine. Specifically, chitosan nanoparticles (CNPs) are extremely biodegradable, pose enhanced biocompatibility and are considered safe for use in medicine.

Methods: CNPs were synthesized by ionic gelation, loaded with rutin (rCNPs) and characterized by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The rCNPs were tested for their cytotoxic effects on human hepatoma Hep3B cells, and experiments were conducted to determine the mechanism of such effects. Further, the biocompatibility of the rCNPs was tested on L929 fibroblasts, and their hemocompatibility was determined.

Results: Initially, UV-vis and FTIR analyses indicated the possible loading of rutin on rCNPs. Further, the rutin load was quantitatively measured using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) and the concentration was 88 µg/mL for 0.22 micron filtered rCNPs. The drug loading capacity (LC%) of the rCNPs was observed to be 13.29 ± 0.68%, and encapsulation efficiency (EE%) was 19.55 ± 1.01%. The drug release was pH-responsive as 88.58% of the drug was released after 24 hrs at the lysosomal pH 5.5, whereas 91.44% of the drug was released at physiological pH 7.4 after 102 hrs. The cytotoxic effects were prominent in 0.22 micron filtered samples of 5 mg/mL rutin precursor. The particle size for the rCNPs at this concentration was 144.1 nm and the polydispersity index (PDI) was 0.244, which is deemed to be ideal for tumor targeting. A zeta potential (ζ-potential) value of 16.4 mV indicated rCNPs with good stability. The IC50 value for the cytotoxic effects of rCNPs on human hepatoma Hep3B cells was 9.7 ± 0.19 μg/mL of rutin load. In addition, the increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) were observed. Gene expression studies indicated that the mechanism for cytotoxic effects of rCNPs on Hep3B cells was due to the activation of Unc-51-like autophagy-activating kinase (ULK1) mediated autophagy and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling besides inhibiting the epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT). In addition, the rCNPs were less toxic on NCTC clone 929 (L929) fibroblasts in comparison to the Hep3B cells and possessed excellent hemocompatibility (less than 2% of hemolysis).

Conclusion: The synthesized rCNPs were pH-responsive and possessed the physicochemical properties suitable for tumor targeting. The particles were effectively cytotoxic on Hep3B cells in comparison to normal cells and possessed excellent hemocompatibility. The very low hemolytic profile of rCNPs indicates that the drug could be administered intravenously for cancer therapy.

Keywords: Hep3B; ROS; mechanism; qPCR; rCNPs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
UV–Vis analysis of the rCNPs and pCNPs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
FTIR analysis of the pCNPs, 0.45 micron filtered rCNPs and 0.22 micron filtered rCNPs.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Continued.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Particle size analysis for the initial drug concentration set at 2 mg/mL for pCNPs and rCNPs along with the initial drug concentration set at 5 mg/mL for rCNPs. (B) Zeta potential of pCNPs and rCNPs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Morphology (5, 10 and 200 nm) and the histogram for particle size of rCNPs along with the morphology of pCNPs (2 nm) using TEM.
Figure 5
Figure 5
In vitro drug release of rutin at cancerous pH 5.5 and physiological pH 7.4.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cytotoxic effects of the pCNPs and rCNPs on Hep3B cells in triplicate and expressed as mean ± SD (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Changes in MMP after treating Hep3B cells with rCNPs (**p < 0.01).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Changes in ROS after treating Hep3B cells with rCNPs (**p < 0.01).
Figure 9
Figure 9
qPCR for analyzing the expression fold of the genes engaged in autophagy and EMT (**p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001).
Figure 10
Figure 10
Cellular uptake and internalization of rCNPs into Hep3B cells (*** p >0.001).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Determination of biocompatibility of rCNPs (a) cytotoxic effects on L929 fibroblasts and (b) its hemocompatibility. The results were expressed as mean ± SD (*p >0.05, ***p >0.001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thun MJ, DeLancey JO, Center MM, Jemal A, Ward EM. The global burden of cancer: priorities for prevention. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(1):100–110. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp263 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oh JH, Jun DW. The latest global burden of liver cancer: a past and present threat. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(2):355–357. doi:10.3350/cmh.2023.0070 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rumgay H, Arnold M, Ferlay J, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol. 2022;77(6):1598–1606. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. Ca a Cancer J Clinicians. 2023;73(1):17–48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J. 2022;135(5):584–590. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms