Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May;52(5):3000605241254330.
doi: 10.1177/03000605241254330.

Clinical markers in heart failure: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Clinical markers in heart failure: a narrative review

Nismat Javed et al. J Int Med Res. 2024 May.

Abstract

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome that is one of the causes of high mortality worldwide. Additionally, healthcare systems around the world are also being burdened by the aging population and subsequently, increasing estimates of patients with heart failure. As a result, it is crucial to determine novel ways to reduce the healthcare costs, rate of hospitalizations and mortality. In this regard, clinical biomarkers play a very important role in stratifying risk, determining prognosis or diagnosis and monitoring patient responses to therapy. This narrative review discusses the wide spectrum of clinical biomarkers, novel inventions of new techniques, their advantages and limitations as well as applications. As heart failure rates increase, cost-effective diagnostic tools such as B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide are crucial, with emerging markers like neprilysin and cardiac imaging showing promise, though larger studies are needed to confirm their effectiveness compared with traditional markers.

Keywords: Heart failure; biomarkers; diagnosis; healthcare cost; monitoring; prognosis; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestThe authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A suggested point-of-care testing regimen using both conventional and novel biomarkers for the management of heart failure. ST-2, soluble isoform of suppression of tumorigenicity 2. The color version of this figure is available at: http://imr.sagepub.com.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roger VL. Epidemiology of heart failure: a contemporary perspective. Circ Res 2021; 128: 1421–1434. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318172. - PubMed
    1. Conrad N, Judge A, Tran J, et al.. Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population‐based study of 4 million individuals. Lancet 2018; 391: 572–580. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32520-5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smeets M, Vaes B, Mamouris P, et al.. Burden of heart failure in Flemish general practices: a registry‐based study in the Intego database. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e022972. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022972. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yan T, Zhu S, Yin X, et al.. Burden, Trends, and Inequalities of Heart Failure Globally, 1990 to 2019: A Secondary Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12: e027852. doi:10.1161/JAHA.122.027852. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al.. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010; 121: e46–e215. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192667. - PubMed