Analysis of outcome reporting in sciatic neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 38780668
- DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06109-8
Analysis of outcome reporting in sciatic neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Purpose: As a first step towards developing a core outcome set (COS) for sciatic neuropathy, the goal of the current study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to identify outcome measures that have been previously reported in studies on sciatic neuropathy.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature from 2000-2024 was performed utilizing PubMed and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Identified articles were screened according to study inclusion/exclusion criteria. Outcome measures reported in each included study were recorded and categorized into motor, sensory, pain, patient-reported outcomes, electrodiagnostic outcomes, imaging outcomes, and composite outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed.
Results: A total of 1586 articles were initially identified, and 31 articles met criteria for inclusion and underwent analysis. The most common outcome domain was pain. A pain outcome was reported in 17 (63%) studies. A motor outcome was reported in 10 (37%) studies; 6 (22%) reported a sensory outcome; 1 (4%) reported a composite outcome; 4 (15%) reported an electrodiagnostic outcome; 5 (19%) reported a patient-reported outcome; 3 (11%) reported an imaging outcome. Across the included studies, 21 unique outcomes were reported.
Conclusions: We have identified the outcome measures that have previously been utilized in studies on sciatic neuropathy. Previously used outcome measures fell into seven domains: motor outcomes, sensory outcomes, pain outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, electrodiagnostic outcomes, imaging outcomes, and composite outcomes. Pain outcomes were most commonly used across the included studies.
Keywords: Clinical research; Core outcome set; Peripheral nerve; Piriformis syndrome; Sciatic nerve; Sciatic neuropathy.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL (1999) The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther 79:371–383 - PubMed
-
- Chalmers I, Glasziou P (2009) Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374:86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60329-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hill B, Williams G, Olver J, Ferris S, Bialocerkowski A (2018) Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the brachial assessment tool part 2: construct validity and responsiveness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99:736–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hill B, Williams G, Olver J, Ferris S, Bialocerkowski A (2018) Psychometric evaluation of the brachial assessment tool part 1: reproducibility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hug NF, Smith BW, Sakamuri S, Jensen M, Purger DA, Spinner RJ, Wilson TJ (2022) Research reporting in cubital tunnel syndrome studies: an analysis of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 164:1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05102-9 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous