Value of cognitive fusion targeted and standard systematic transrectal prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
- PMID: 38783630
- PMCID: PMC11449411
- DOI: 10.4103/aja202414
Value of cognitive fusion targeted and standard systematic transrectal prostate biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the accuracies of cognitive fusion-guided targeted biopsy (TB), systematic biopsy (SB), and combined TB+SB for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in males with lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We conducted a retrospective analysis of individuals who underwent prostate biopsy at Peking University People's Hospital (Beijing, China), with an emphasis on patients with both transrectal TB and SB. The main objective was to determine the precisions of SB, TB, and TB+SB for diagnosing PCa and csPCa. We also evaluated the detection rates of TB, SB, TB+ipsilateral-SB (ipsi-SB), TB+contralateral-SB (contra-SB), and TB+SB for PCa and csPCa in patients with unilateral MRI lesions. We compared the diagnostic yields of the various biopsy schemes using the McNemar's test. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The rates of PCa detection using TB, SB, and TB+SB were 52.8%, 62.2%, and 66.7%, respectively, and the corresponding rates for csPCa were 46.1%, 56.7%, and 58.3%, respectively. Among patients with unilateral MRI lesions, the PCa detection rates for TB, SB, TB+ipsi-SB, TB+contra-SB, and TB+SB were 53.3%, 64.8%, 65.6%, 61.5%, and 68.0%, respectively. TB+ipsi-SB detected 96.4% of PCa and 95.9% of csPCa cases. These findings suggest that the combination of TB+SB has better diagnostic accuracy compared with SB or TB alone. For patients with unilateral MRI lesions, the combination of TB+ipsi-SB may be suitable in clinical settings.
Copyright © 2024 Copyright: ©The Author(s)(2024).
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declared no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection with various prostate sampling schemes based on different csPCa definitions.BMC Urol. 2021 Dec 23;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00949-7. BMC Urol. 2021. PMID: 34949183 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy.Urology. 2017 Apr;102:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 18. Urology. 2017. PMID: 27871829
-
Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Apr;3(2):216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 22. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31239236
-
Diagnostic Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naïve Men: A Meta-Analysis.Urol Int. 2020;104(3-4):187-198. doi: 10.1159/000504028. Epub 2019 Dec 11. Urol Int. 2020. PMID: 31825927
-
mpMRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Sep;30(5):711-719. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000801. Curr Opin Urol. 2020. PMID: 32732624
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48. - PubMed
-
- Mottet N, van den Bergh RC, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update Part 1:screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79:243–62. - PubMed
-
- Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1:2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76:340–51. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS):a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815–22. - PubMed
-
- Rouvière O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R, Claudon M, Roy C, et al. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST):a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:100–9. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical