Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 9:12:1398397.
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1398397. eCollection 2024.

Recent advances in catalytic asymmetric synthesis

Affiliations
Review

Recent advances in catalytic asymmetric synthesis

Ashna Garg et al. Front Chem. .

Abstract

Asymmetric catalysis stands at the forefront of modern chemistry, serving as a cornerstone for the efficient creation of enantiopure chiral molecules characterized by their high selectivity. In this review, we delve into the realm of asymmetric catalytic reactions, which spans various methodologies, each contributing to the broader landscape of the enantioselective synthesis of chiral molecules. Transition metals play a central role as catalysts for a wide range of transformations with chiral ligands such as phosphines, N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs), etc., facilitating the formation of chiral C-C and C-X bonds, enabling precise control over stereochemistry. Enantioselective photocatalytic reactions leverage the power of light as a driving force for the synthesis of chiral molecules. Asymmetric electrocatalysis has emerged as a sustainable approach, being both atom-efficient and environmentally friendly, while offering a versatile toolkit for enantioselective reductions and oxidations. Biocatalysis relies on nature's most efficient catalysts, i.e., enzymes, to provide exquisite selectivity, as well as a high tolerance for diverse functional groups under mild conditions. Thus, enzymatic optical resolution, kinetic resolution and dynamic kinetic resolution have revolutionized the production of enantiopure compounds. Enantioselective organocatalysis uses metal-free organocatalysts, consisting of modular chiral phosphorus, sulfur and nitrogen components, facilitating remarkably efficient and diverse enantioselective transformations. Additionally, unlocking traditionally unreactive C-H bonds through selective functionalization has expanded the arsenal of catalytic asymmetric synthesis, enabling the efficient and atom-economical construction of enantiopure chiral molecules. Incorporating flow chemistry into asymmetric catalysis has been transformative, as continuous flow systems provide precise control over reaction conditions, enhancing the efficiency and facilitating optimization. Researchers are increasingly adopting hybrid approaches that combine multiple strategies synergistically to tackle complex synthetic challenges. This convergence holds great promise, propelling the field of asymmetric catalysis forward and facilitating the efficient construction of complex molecules in enantiopure form. As these methodologies evolve and complement one another, they push the boundaries of what can be accomplished in catalytic asymmetric synthesis, leading to the discovery of novel, highly selective transformations which may lead to groundbreaking applications across various industries.

Keywords: C-H activation; asymmetric catalytic synthesis; asymmetric electrocatalysis; asymmetric organocatalysis; asymmetric photocatalysis; biocatalysis; flow chemistry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Asymmetric enamine-iminium catalysis (A−C).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Chiral Brønsted acid catalyzed asymmetric reactions (A−C).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Chiral Brønsted base and hydrogen-donor catalyzed asymmetric reactions (A−C).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Chiral NHC catalyzed asymmetric synthesis (A,B).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Hypervalent iodine catalyzed asymmetric transformations (A,B).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Metallaphotoredox asymmetric catalysis (A−C).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Photoredox organocatalysis for asymmetric synthesis (A−C).
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Eelectrochemical organocatalysis for asymmetric synthesis (A−C).
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Metallaelectrocatalytic asymmetric synthesis (A−D).
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
Photoelectrocatalysis for asymmetric cyanations (A,B).
FIGURE 11
FIGURE 11
Asymmetric enzymatic biocatalysis (A−D).
FIGURE 12
FIGURE 12
Asymmetric photoredox enzymatic biocatalysis (A,B).
FIGURE 13
FIGURE 13
Enantioselective 1,4-addition reactions in continuous flow system (A−C).
FIGURE 14
FIGURE 14
Enantioselective 1,2-addition reactions in continuous flow system (A−D).
FIGURE 15
FIGURE 15
Asymmetric hydrogenation and carbon-heteroatom bond forming reactions in continuous flow system (A−D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akiyama T., Itoh J., Yokota K., Fuchibe K. (2004). Enantioselective Mannich-type reaction catalyzed by a chiral Brønsted acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (12), 1566–1568. 10.1002/anie.200353240 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akiyama T., Ojima I. (2022) Catalytic asymmetric synthesis. 4th Edition. USA: John Wiley and Sons.
    1. Albini A., Fagnoni M. (2004). Green chemistry and photochemistry were born at the same time. Green Chem. 6 (1), 1–6. 10.1039/b309592d - DOI
    1. Alfano A. I., Sorato A., Ciogli A., Lange H., Brindisi M. (2023). Enantioselective catalytic Strecker reaction on cyclic (Z)-aldimines in flow: reaction optimization and sustainability aspects. J. Flow Chem. 14, 197–210. 10.1007/s41981-023-00279-9 - DOI
    1. Arnaboldi S., Magni M., Mussini P. R. (2018). Enantioselective selectors for chiral electrochemistry and electroanalysis: stereogenic elements and enantioselection performance. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 8, 60–72. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.01.002 - DOI