Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 29;27(6):109856.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109856. eCollection 2024 Jun 21.

Automated 3D cytoplasm segmentation in soft X-ray tomography

Affiliations

Automated 3D cytoplasm segmentation in soft X-ray tomography

Ayse Erozan et al. iScience. .

Abstract

Cells' structure is key to understanding cellular function, diagnostics, and therapy development. Soft X-ray tomography (SXT) is a unique tool to image cellular structure without fixation or labeling at high spatial resolution and throughput. Fast acquisition times increase demand for accelerated image analysis, like segmentation. Currently, segmenting cellular structures is done manually and is a major bottleneck in the SXT data analysis. This paper introduces ACSeg, an automated 3D cytoplasm segmentation model. ACSeg is generated using semi-automated labels and 3D U-Net and is trained on 43 SXT tomograms of immune T cells, rapidly converging to high-accuracy segmentation, therefore reducing time and labor. Furthermore, adding only 6 SXT tomograms of other cell types diversifies the model, showing potential for optimal experimental design. ACSeg successfully segmented unseen tomograms and is published on Biomedisa, enabling high-throughput analysis of cell volume and structure of cytoplasm in diverse cell types.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Cell biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Automated cytoplasm segmentation workflow with semi-automated labeling
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dice coefficient according to alteration of the number of the training data
Figure 3
Figure 3
ACSeg segmentation and morphological quantification of T cells The volume (A) and surface area to volume ratio (B) of the cell were measured in the ground truth and prediction of cytoplasm segmentation with the ACSeg. nsp > 0.05, ∗∶ 0.01 < p<=0.05, ∗∗∶ 0.001 < p<=0.01, using paired t test. N = 10. (C) 3D rendering of Biomedisa (C1) and prediction of the ACSeg (C2), respectively, visual comparison of Biomedisa and our model’s prediction (C3). The box in C3 denotes the area shown up closely in C4.
Figure 4
Figure 4
3D quantification of cytoplasm segmentation accuracy for classical approaches
Figure 5
Figure 5
2D quantification of cytoplasm segmentation accuracy in comparison to SAM
Figure 6
Figure 6
Prediction of the ACSeg over T, BV-2, Huh-7, and MEF cells

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinhardt V., Chen J.H., Ekman A., McDermott G., Le Gros M.A., Larabell C. Imaging cell morphology and physiology using X-rays. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019;47:489–508. doi: 10.1042/BST20180036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michael J. What do we mean when we talk about “structure/function” relationships? Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2021;45:880–885. doi: 10.1152/advan.00108.2021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Darrow M.C., Zhang Y., Cinquin B.P., Smith E.A., Boudreau R., Rochat R.H., Schmid M.F., Xia Y., Larabell C.A., Chiu W. Visualizing red blood cell sickling and the effects of inhibition of sphingosine kinase 1 using soft X-ray tomography. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:3511–3517. doi: 10.1242/jcs.189225. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu P.Y., Chin L.K., Ser W., Chen H.F., Hsieh C.M., Lee C.H., Sung K.B., Ayi T.C., Yap P.H., Liedberg B., et al. Cell refractive index for cell biology and disease diagnosis: past, present and future. Lab Chip. 2016;16:634–644. doi: 10.1039/C5LC01445J. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gurcan M.N., Boucheron L.E., Can A., Madabhushi A., Rajpoot N.M., Yener B. Histopathological image analysis: A review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009;2:147–171. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2009.2034865. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources