Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;33(5):851-858.
doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i5.15.

Radiographic Evaluation of Impacted Third Mandibular Molar According to the Classification of Winter, Pell and Gregory in a Sample of Cameroonian Population

Edouma Jacques  1 , Messina Ebogo  2 , Yann-Chris Eng  3 , Ntenkeu Donald  1 , Zeh Odile  3
Affiliations

Radiographic Evaluation of Impacted Third Mandibular Molar According to the Classification of Winter, Pell and Gregory in a Sample of Cameroonian Population

Edouma Jacques et al. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The extraction of impacted third molars (M3) is a common surgical procedure in dentistry and oral surgery. Various complications, including inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) damage, may occur during and after extraction of this tooth. Radiographic examination should provide information about the M3 itself, but also about the surrounding bony structure and the relationship of the roots to the IAN and the adjacent second molar, which is often traumatized during this extraction. The aim of our study was to evaluate the depth and angulation of impacted mandibular third molars (M3) from panoramic radiographs, according to the classifications proposed by Winter and Pell & Gregory.

Methods: Radiographic signs present on the orthopantomogram showing M3 depth, and retromandibular available space according to the Pell & Gregory classification were evaluated. Evaluation of the M3 angulation relative to the M2 according to Winter's classification was also done. Student's t test was used to determine the association between side or sex and different variables.

Results: The depth of impaction of the M3 crown was level A accounting for 54.4% (n=260) of the PR while level B constituted 35.7% (n=171) of the images. Regarding the availability of retromandibular space, Class I constituted 36.8% (n=176). The Class II accounted for 55.9% (n=267) of PR.

Conclusion: Our study showed that 54.4% of M3 were located at the same level as the occlusal plane of the second molar, while in 56% of PR the space between the second molar and the ramus of the mandible is less than the mesiodistal diameter of the third molar. This research showed that 23.1% of M3 had a level of vertical angulation, a level that allows for less painful luxation of the impacted molars. These results seem to show a relatively high level of difficulty in mobilizing and extracting M3 from Cameroonian patients.

Keywords: Winter classification; clinical landmarks; mandibular 3rd molar; panoramic radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pell & Gregory classification (9)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Angulation of M3 according to Winter classification (11)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Choi E, Lee S, Jeong E, Shin S, Youm S, Son Y, et al. Artificial intelligence in positioning between tooth and nerve on panoramic radiography. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan MI, Janjua OS, Hammad M, Warraich RA. The relationship of mandibular third molars with inferior alveolar nerve based on orthopantomogram. International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020;6(2):56–59.
    1. On S, Seoung W, Soo H, Byoung E. Clinical significance of intraoperative exposure of inferior alveolar nerve during surgical extraction of the mandibular third molar in nerve injury. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10(19):4379. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renton T, McGurk M. Evaluation of factors predictive of lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2001;39(6):423–428. - PubMed
    1. Sánchez-Torres A, Soler-Capdevila J, Ustrell-Barral M, Gay-Escoda C. Patient, radiological, and operative factors associated with surgical difficulty in the extraction of third molars: a systematic review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2020;49(5):655–665. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources