Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun;66(4):e2300147.
doi: 10.1002/bimj.202300147.

A nonparametric proportional risk model to assess a treatment effect in time-to-event data

Affiliations

A nonparametric proportional risk model to assess a treatment effect in time-to-event data

Lucia Ameis et al. Biom J. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Time-to-event analysis often relies on prior parametric assumptions, or, if a semiparametric approach is chosen, Cox's model. This is inherently tied to the assumption of proportional hazards, with the analysis potentially invalidated if this assumption is not fulfilled. In addition, most interpretations focus on the hazard ratio, that is often misinterpreted as the relative risk (RR), the ratio of the cumulative distribution functions. In this paper, we introduce an alternative to current methodology for assessing a treatment effect in a two-group situation, not relying on the proportional hazards assumption but assuming proportional risks. Precisely, we propose a new nonparametric model to directly estimate the RR of two groups to experience an event under the assumption that the risk ratio is constant over time. In addition to this relative measure, our model allows for calculating the number needed to treat as an absolute measure, providing the possibility of an easy and holistic interpretation of the data. We demonstrate the validity of the approach by means of a simulation study and present an application to data from a large randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of dapagliflozin on all-cause mortality.

Keywords: hazard ratio; number needed to treat; risk; time‐to‐event analysis; treatment effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aalen, O. O., & Johansen, S. (1978). An empirical transition matrix for non‐homogeneous Markov chains based on censored observations. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 5(3), 141–150. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615704
    1. Andersen, P. K., Borgan, O., Gill, R. D., & Keiding, N. (1993). Statistical models based on counting processes. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer. Corrected second printing, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4612‐4348‐9
    1. Andersen, P. K., & Keiding, N. (2012). Interpretability and importance of functionals in competing risks and multistate models. Statistics in Medicine, 31(11‐12), 1074–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4385
    1. Breslow, N., & Crowley, J. (1974). A large sample study of the life table and product limit estimates under random censorship. Annals of Statistics, 2(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176342705
    1. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life‐tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517‐6161.1972.tb00899.x

LinkOut - more resources