Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 16;11(5):152.
doi: 10.3390/jcdd11050152.

Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wajeeh Ur Rehman et al. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Atherosclerosis is a multi-factorial disease, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a critical risk factor in developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Cholesteryl-ester transfer-protein (CETP), synthesized by the liver, regulates LDL-C and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) through the bidirectional transfer of lipids. The novelty of CETP inhibitors (CETPis) has granted new focus towards increasing HDL-C, besides lowering LDL-C strategies. To date, five CETPis that are projected to improve lipid profiles, torcetrapib, dalcetrapib, evacetrapib, anacetrapib, and obicetrapib, have reached late-stage clinical development for ASCVD risk reduction. Early trials failed to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular occurrences. Given the advent of some recent large-scale clinical trials (ACCELERATE, HPS3/TIMI55-REVEAL Collaborative Group), conducting a meta-analysis is essential to investigate CETPis' efficacy.

Methods: We conducted a thorough search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that commenced between 2003 and 2023; CETPi versus placebo studies with a ≥6-month follow-up and defined outcomes were eligible.

Primary outcomes: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality, all-cause mortality.

Secondary outcomes: stroke, revascularization, hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction (MI).

Results: Nine RCTs revealed that the use of a CETPi significantly reduced CVD-related mortality (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.98; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%); the same studies also reduced the risk of MI (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.98; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%), which was primarily attributed to anacetrapib. The use of a CETPi did not reduce the likelihood any other outcomes.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis shows, for the first time, that CETPis are associated with reduced CVD-related mortality and MI.

Keywords: CETP inhibitors; HDL-C lipoproteins; LDL-C lipoproteins; anacetrapib; atherosclerosis; cholesterol ester transfer protein; dalceprapib; evacetrapib; obicetrapib; torcetrapib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of MACEs outcome [10,27,29,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] *. The values of each study (represented by black diamonds), in which the size is determined by 95% CI; the effect size of each individual study in the meta-analysis (represented by blue squares).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of CVD mortality outcome [10,27,29,33,35,36,37,38,40] *. The values of each study (represented by black diamonds), in which the size is determined by 95% CI; the effect size of each individual study in the meta-analysis (represented by blue squares).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the all-cause mortality outcome [10,27,29,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] *. The values of each study (represented by black diamonds), in which the size is determined by 95% CI; the effect size of each individual study in the meta-analysis (represented by blue squares).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of the myocardial infarction outcome [10,27,29,33,35,36,37,38,40] *. The values of each study (represented by black diamonds), in which the size is determined by 95% CI; the effect size of each individual study in the meta-analysis (represented by blue squares).

References

    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Baigent C., Blackwell L., Emberson J., Holland L.E., Reith C., Bhala N., Peto R., Barnes E.H., Keech A., et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1670–1681. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nurmohamed N.S., Navar A.M., Kastelein J.J.P. New and Emerging Therapies for Reduction of LDL-Cholesterol and Apolipoprotein B: JACC Focus Seminar 1/4. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021;77:1564–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.079. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gotto A.M. Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol as a Risk Factor in Coronary Heart Disease. Circulation. 2001;103:2213–2218. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.17.2213. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xue H., Zhang M., Liu J., Wang J., Ren G. Structure-based mechanism and inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2023;25:155–166. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01087-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Endo Y., Fujita M., Ikewaki K. HDL Functions—Current Status and Future Perspectives. Biomolecules. 2023;13:105. doi: 10.3390/biom13010105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources