Retracted: Navigating board dynamics: Configuration analysis of corporate governance's factors and their impact on bank performance
- PMID: 38787827
- PMCID: PMC11125541
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300283
Retracted: Navigating board dynamics: Configuration analysis of corporate governance's factors and their impact on bank performance
Erratum in
-
Correction: Navigating board dynamics: Configuration analysis of corporate governance's factors and their impact on bank performance.PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0319614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319614. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39970191 Free PMC article.
Retraction in
-
Retraction: Navigating board dynamics: Configuration analysis of corporate governance's factors and their impact on bank performance.PLoS One. 2025 Oct 23;20(10):e0334869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334869. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 41129492 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
This research utilizes the fsQCA technique to investigate how a combination of corporate governance conditions or factors collectively influences the performance of banks. Examining key elements such as board size, busy directors, independent directors, CEO duality, and women on the board, the research employs data collected from the annual reports of 30 banks spanning from 2010 to 2020. The necessary condition analysis (NCA) underscores that no individual condition or factor is indispensable for the ultimate outcome. Nevertheless, the sufficiency analysis reveals distinct solutions, each representing a unique set of conditions or factors sufficient to generate the outcome. The study concludes that the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and bank performance is complex and multifaceted, with neither ROA nor ROE reliant on a singular input condition or factor. The theoretical contributions of the findings align with or partially support various theories and propositions within the realm of corporate governance. Notably, the application of fsQCA contributes to enhance the methodological understanding of corporate governance studies in existing literature.
Copyright: © 2024 Tahir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Shahid M. S., & Abbas M. (2019). Does corporate governance play any role in investor confidence, corporate investment decisions relationship? Evidence from Pakistan and India. Journal of Economics and Business, 105, 105839.
-
- Botti L., Boubaker S., Hamrouni A., & Solonandrasana B. (2014). Corporate governance efficiency and internet financial reporting quality. Review of Accounting and finance, 13(1), 43–64.
-
- Naidoo I. A. (2011). The role of monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance in South Africa: A case study of the Department of Social Development. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.
-
- Chen K. C., Chen Z., & Wei K. J. (2009). Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of corporate finance, 15(3), 273–289.
-
- Cheung S. Y., & Chan B. Y. (2004). Corporate governance in Asia. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 11(2), 1–32.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
