Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Sep;79(9):957-966.
doi: 10.1111/anae.16326. Epub 2024 May 24.

Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airway management: a randomised controlled trial

Vera Köhl  1 , Viktor A Wünsch  1 , Marie-Claire Müller  1 , Phillip B Sasu  1 , Thorsten Dohrmann  1 , Tanja Peters  1 , Josephine Tolkmitt  1 , André Dankert  1 , Linda Krause  2 , Christian Zöllner  1 , Martin Petzoldt  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airway management: a randomised controlled trial

Vera Köhl et al. Anaesthesia. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background: It is not certain whether the blade geometry of videolaryngoscopes, either a hyperangulated or Macintosh shape, affects glottic view, success rate and/or tracheal intubation time in patients with expected difficult airways. We hypothesised that using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade would visualise a higher percentage of glottic opening compared with a Macintosh videolaryngoscope blade in patients with expected difficult airways.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial in adult patients scheduled to undergo elective ear, nose and throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery, who were anticipated to have a difficult airway. All airway operators were consultant anaesthetists. Patients were allocated randomly to tracheal intubation with either hyperangulated (C-MAC D-BLADE™) or Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (C-MAC™). The primary outcome was the percentage of glottic opening. First attempt success was designated a key secondary outcome.

Results: We assessed 2540 adults scheduled for elective head and neck surgery for eligibility and included 182 patients with expected difficult airways undergoing orotracheal intubation. The percentage of glottic opening visualised, expressed as median (IQR [range]), was 89 (69-99 [0-100])% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 54 (9-90 [0-100])% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001). First-line hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy failed in one patient and Macintosh videolaryngoscopy in 12 patients (13%, p = 0.002). First attempt success rate was 97% with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades and 67% with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Glottic view and first attempt success rate were superior with hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades compared with Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades when used by experienced anaesthetists in patients with difficult airways.

Keywords: airway management; intubation, intratracheal; laryngoscopes; laryngoscopy; respiratory system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cook TM, Boniface NJ, Seller C, Hughes J, Damen C, MacDonald L, Kelly FE. Universal videolaryngoscopy: a structured approach to conversion to videolaryngoscopy for all intubations in an anaesthetic and intensive care department. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120: 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.014.
    1. De Jong A, Sfara T, Pouzeratte Y, et al. Videolaryngoscopy as a first‐intention technique for tracheal intubation in unselected surgical patients: a before and after observational study. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129: 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.030.
    1. Kohse EK, Siebert HK, Sasu PB, et al. A model to predict difficult airway alerts after videolaryngoscopy in adults with anticipated difficult airways ‐ the VIDIAC score. Anaesthesia 2022; 77: 1089–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15841.
    1. Siebert HK, Kohse EK, Petzoldt M. A universal classification for videolaryngoscopy using the VIDIAC score requires real world conditions: a reply. Anaesthesia 2023; 78: 126. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15892.
    1. Cook TM, Kelly FE, Boniface N, Seller C. Universal videolaryngoscopy: the importance of choosing the right device. Reply to ‘Cognitive re‐engineering after a 15‐year experience with routine videolaryngoscopy’ (Br J Anaesth 2019; 122: e57‐8). Br J Anaesth 2019; 122: e59–e60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.014.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources