Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 3;15(5):581.
doi: 10.3390/genes15050581.

Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues

Affiliations
Review

Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues

Martina C Cornel et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

In many countries, some form of genetic screening is offered to all or part of the population, either in the form of well-organized screening programs or in a less formalized way. Screening can be offered at different phases of life, such as preconception, prenatal, neonatal and later in life. Screening should only be offered if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Technical innovations in testing and treatment are driving changes in the field of prenatal and neonatal screening, where many jurisdictions have organized population-based screening programs. As a result, a greater number and wider range of conditions are being added to the programs, which can benefit couples' reproductive autonomy (preconception and prenatal screening) and improve early diagnosis to prevent irreversible health damage in children (neonatal screening) and in adults (cancer and cascade screening). While many developments in screening are technology-driven, citizens may also express a demand for innovation in screening, as was the case with non-invasive prenatal testing. Relatively new emerging issues for genetic screening, especially if testing is performed using DNA sequencing, relate to organization, data storage and interpretation, benefit-harm ratio and distributive justice, information provision and follow-up, all connected to acceptability in current healthcare systems.

Keywords: DNA sequencing; cascade screening; genetic carrier screening; genetic screening; neonatal screening; prenatal screening; screening criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sources of dynamics in genetic screening innovations (adapted from [11]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screening at different phases in life.

References

    1. Godard B., ten Kate L., Evers-Kiebooms G., Aymé S. Population genetic screening programmes: Principles, techniques, practices, and policies. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;11:S49–S87. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201113. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turnbull C., Firth H.V., Wilkie A.O.M., Newman W., Raymond F.L., Tomlinson I., Lachmann R., Wright C.F., Wordsworth S., George A., et al. Population screening requires robust evidence-genomics is no exception. Lancet. 2024;403:583–586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02295-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson J.M.G., Jungner G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease Geneva. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 1968.
    1. Andermann A., Blancquaert I., Beauchamp S., Déry V. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: A review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull. World Health Organ. 2008;86:317–319. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.050112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornel M.C., Rigter T., Jansen M.E., Henneman L. Neonatal and carrier screening for rare diseases: How innovation challenges screening criteria worldwide. J. Community Genet. 2021;12:257–265. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00488-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed