Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 28;12(5):972.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12050972.

Relationship between Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Autonomic Nervous System

Affiliations
Review

Relationship between Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Autonomic Nervous System

Giovanni Messina et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) approaches have seen a rise in utilization in both clinical and basic neuroscience in recent years. Here, we concentrate on the two methods that have received the greatest research: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Both approaches have yielded pertinent data regarding the cortical excitability in subjects in good health as well as pertinent advancements in the management of various clinical disorders. NIBS is a helpful method for comprehending the cortical control of the ANS. Previous research has shown that there are notable changes in muscular sympathetic nerve activity when the motor cortex is modulated. Furthermore, in NIBS investigations, the ANS has been employed more frequently as an outcome measure to comprehend the overall impacts of these methods, including their safety profile. Though there is ample proof that brain stimulation has autonomic effects on animals, new research on the connection between NIBS and the ANS has produced contradictory findings. In order to better understand NIBS processes and ANS function, it is crucial to take into account the reciprocal relationship that exists between central modulation and ANS function.

Keywords: ANS; HRV; TMS; heart rate variability; non-invasive brain stimulation; rTMS; tDCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Schmaußer M., Hoffmann S., Raab M., Laborde S. The Effects of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Neurosci. Res. 2022;100:1664–1694. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baeken C., van Beek V., Vanderhasselt M.-A., Duprat R., Klooster D. Cortical Thickness in the Right Anterior Cingulate Cortex Relates to Clinical Response to Left Prefrontal Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation: An Exploratory Study. Neuromodul. Technol. Neural Interface. 2021;24:938–949. doi: 10.1111/ner.13380. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beda A., Simpson D.M., Carvalho N.C., Carvalho A.R.S. Low-frequency Heart Rate Variability Is Related to the Breath-to-breath Variability in the Respiratory Pattern. Psychophysiology. 2014;51:197–205. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12163. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bär K.-J., Herbsleb M., Schumann A., de la Cruz F., Gabriel H.W., Wagner G. Hippocampal-Brainstem Connectivity Associated with Vagal Modulation after an Intense Exercise Intervention in Healthy Men. Front. Neurosci. 2016;10:145. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00145. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger C., Domes G., Balschat J., Thome J., Höppner J. Effects of Prefrontal RTMS on Autonomic Reactions to Affective Pictures. J. Neural Transm. 2017;124:139–152. doi: 10.1007/s00702-015-1491-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources