Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 20;16(10):1942.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16101942.

Clinical Biomarkers of Tumour Radiosensitivity and Predicting Benefit from Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Biomarkers of Tumour Radiosensitivity and Predicting Benefit from Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review

Christopher W Bleaney et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Modern advanced radiotherapy techniques have improved the precision and accuracy of radiotherapy delivery, with resulting plans being highly personalised based on individual anatomy. Adaptation for individual tumour biology remains elusive. There is an unmet need for biomarkers of intrinsic radiosensitivity that can predict tumour response to radiation to facilitate individualised decision-making, dosing and treatment planning. Over the last few decades, the use of high throughput molecular biology technologies has led to an explosion of newly discovered cancer biomarkers. Gene expression signatures are now used routinely in clinic to aid decision-making regarding adjuvant systemic therapy. They have great potential as radiotherapy biomarkers. A previous systematic review published in 2015 reported only five studies of signatures evaluated for their ability to predict radiotherapy benefits in clinical cohorts. This updated systematic review encompasses the expanded number of studies reported in the last decade. An additional 27 studies were identified. In total, 22 distinct signatures were recognised (5 pre-2015, 17 post-2015). Seventeen signatures were 'radiosensitivity' signatures and five were breast cancer prognostic signatures aiming to identify patients at an increased risk of local recurrence and therefore were more likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation. Most signatures (15/22) had not progressed beyond the discovery phase of development, with no suitable validated clinical-grade assay for application. Very few signatures (4/17 'radiosensitivity' signatures) had undergone any laboratory-based biological validation of their ability to predict tumour radiosensitivity. No signatures have been assessed prospectively in a phase III biomarker-led trial to date and none are recommended for routine use in clinical guidelines. A phase III prospective evaluation is ongoing for two breast cancer prognostic signatures. The most promising radiosensitivity signature remains the radiosensitivity index (RSI), which is used to calculate a genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD). There is an ongoing phase II prospective biomarker-led study of RSI/GARD in triple negative breast cancer. The results of these trials are eagerly anticipated over the coming years. Future work in this area should focus on (1) robust biological validation; (2) building biobanks alongside large radiotherapy randomised controlled trials with dose variance (to demonstrate an interaction between radiosensitivity signature and dose); (3) a validation of clinical-grade cost-effective assays that are deliverable within current healthcare infrastructure; and (4) an integration with biomarkers of other determinants of radiation response.

Keywords: biomarker; gene expression signature; radiosensitivity; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search flow diagram. Citations identified and numbers excluded according to criteria in Table 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proposed steps towards clinical implementation of a radiosensitivity biomarker/numbers of identified signatures with evidence of each stage of development are shown. Prospective validation is defined as completion of this step; however, it is noted that this is ongoing or planned for some signatures. FFPE = formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded; SOP = standard operating procedure; RCT = randomised controlled trial.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borras J.M., Lievens Y., Dunscombe P., Coffey M., Malicki J., Corral J., Gasparotto C., Defourny N., Barton M., Verhoeven R., et al. The Optimal Utilization Proportion of External Beam Radiotherapy in European Countries: An ESTRO-HERO Analysis. Radiother. Oncol. 2015;116:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.04.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandra R.A., Keane F.K., Voncken F.E.M., Thomas C.R. Contemporary Radiotherapy: Present and Future. Lancet. 2021;398:171–184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00233-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boustani J., Grapin M., Laurent P., Apetoh L., Mirjolet C. The 6th R of Radiobiology: Reactivation of Anti-Tumor Immune Response. Cancers. 2019;11:680. doi: 10.3390/cancers11060860. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steel G.G., McMillan T.J., Peacock J.H. The 5Rs of Radiobiology. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1989;56:1045–1048. doi: 10.1080/09553008914552491. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources