Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 16;60(5):819.
doi: 10.3390/medicina60050819.

Contemporary Advances in Cardiac Remote Monitoring: A Comprehensive, Updated Mini-Review

Affiliations
Review

Contemporary Advances in Cardiac Remote Monitoring: A Comprehensive, Updated Mini-Review

Alberto Preda et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Over the past decade, remote monitoring (RM) has become an increasingly popular way to improve healthcare and health outcomes. Modern cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are capable of recording an increasing amount of data related to CIED function, arrhythmias, physiological status and hemodynamic parameters, providing in-depth and updated information on patient cardiovascular function. The extensive use of RM for patients with CIED allows for early diagnosis and rapid assessment of relevant issues, both clinical and technical, as well as replacing outpatient follow-up improving overall management without compromise safety. This approach is recommended by current guidelines for all eligible patients affected by different chronic cardiac conditions including either brady- and tachy-arrhythmias and heart failure. Beyond to clinical advantages, RM has demonstrated cost-effectiveness and is associated with elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Future perspectives include improving security, interoperability and diagnostic power as well as to engage patients with digital health technology. This review aims to update existing data concerning clinical outcomes in patients managed with RM in the wide spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias and Hear Failure (HF), disclosing also about safety, effectiveness, patient satisfaction and cost-saving.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardiac implantable electronic device; heart failure; remote monitoring; ventricular arrhythmias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Benefits of Remote Monitoring.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Benefits of RM in terms of Arrhythmias Management.

References

    1. Lee J.H., Lee S.R., Choi E.K., Jeong J., Park H.D., You S.J., Lee S.S., Oh S. Temporal Trends of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantations: A Nationwide Population-based Study. Korean Circ. J. 2019;49:841–852. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0444. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valzania C., Torbica A., Tarricone R., Leyva F., Boriani G. Implant rates of cardiac implantable electrical devices in Europe: A systematic literature review. Health Policy. 2016;120:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.11.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Su J., Fora B., Chivers M. The impact of remote patient monitoring devices and systems on clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: Results from a targeted literature review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023;81:2273. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(23)02717-1. - DOI
    1. Varma N., Braunschweig F., Burri H., Hindricks G., Linz D., Michowitz Y., Ricci R.P., Nielsen J.C. Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and disease management. EP Europace. 2023;25:euad233. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slotwiner D., Varma N., Akar J.G., Annas G., Beardsall M., Fogel R.I., Galizio N.O., Glotzer T.V., Leahy R.A., Love C.J., et al. HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:e69–e100. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.008. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms