Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 18;12(5):553.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050553.

A Low Number of Baselines γδ T Cells Increases the Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Post-Vaccination Infection

Affiliations

A Low Number of Baselines γδ T Cells Increases the Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Post-Vaccination Infection

Juan Carlos Andreu-Ballester et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is the biggest global health problem in the last hundred years. The efficacy of the vaccine to protect against severe disease is estimated to be 70-95% according to the studies carried out, although there are aspects of the immune response to the vaccine that remain unclear. Methods: Humoral and cellular immunity after the administration of three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford AstraZeneca vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 over one year and the appearance of post-vaccination COVID-19 were studied. SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies, αβ and γδ T-cell subsets, and their differentiation stages and apoptosis were analyzed. Results: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies showed a progressive increase throughout the duration of the study. This increase was the greatest after the third dose. The highest levels were observed in subjects who had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies prior to vaccination. There was an increase in CD4+ αβ, CD8+ γδ and TEM CD8+ γδ T cells, and a decrease in apoptosis in CD4+ CD8+ and CD56+ αβ and γδ T cells. Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection was greater than 60%. The symptoms of COVID-19 were very mild and were related to a γδ T cell deficit, specifically CD8+ TEMRA and CD56+ γδ TEM, as well as lower pre-vaccine apoptosis levels. Conclusions: The results unveil the important role of γδ T cells in SARS-CoV-2-vaccine-mediated protection from the disease.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; vaccine; αβ T cells; γδ T cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Evolution time of vaccination and post-vaccination COVID-19 infection. Analysis: 0 (baseline), pre-vaccine; 1st: 1 month after the first dose; 2nd: 1 month after the second dose; 3rd: 6 months after the second dose; 4th: 1 month after the third dose.
Figure 1
Figure 1
(Panel A): SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies after vaccination. 0 = pre-vaccine; 1st: 1 month after the first dose; 2nd: 1 month after the second dose; 3rd: 6 months after the second dose; 4th: 1 month after the third dose. (Panel B): CD19+ B cells according to IgG- and IgA-positive pre-vaccination (PI) or not (No). The number B cells is expressed as the mean, and double T bars denote the standard deviation (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). For the differences between five analyses, the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test was used. For the differences between pre-infection (PI) and no infection (No), the Mann–Whitney U test was used.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number (Panel A) and percentages (apoptosis) (Panel B) of αβ and γδ T-cell subsets (CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD4-CD8-, CD3+CD56+) in the peripheral blood of subjects vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, according to pre-anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (PI) (red) or not (blue). Analysis during vaccination: 0 = pre-vaccine; 1st: 1 month after the first dose; 2nd: 1 month after the second dose; 3rd: 6 months after the second dose; 4th: 1 month after the third dose. A non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare the evolution of antibodies of γδ T-cell subsets. The Mann–Whitney U test was used was used to compare the differences between pre-infection (PI) and no infection (No). Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentages of αβ T-cell subsets (CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD4-CD8-, CD3+CD56+) at differentiation stages (TN: naïve = Panel A, TCM: central memory = Panel B, TEM: effector memory = Panel C and TEMRA: terminal effector memory = Panel D) in the peripheral blood of subjects vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, according to pre-infection (PI) (red) or no infection (blue). Analysis during vaccination: 0 = pre-vaccine; 1st: 1 month after the first dose; 2nd: 1 month after the second dose; 3rd: 6 months after the second dose; 4th: 1 month after the third dose. A non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare the evolution of antibodies mean of αβ T-cell subsets. The Mann–Whitney U test was used was used to compare the differences between pre-infection (PI) and no infection (No). Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentages of γδ T-cell subsets (CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD4-CD8-, CD3+CD56+) at differentiation stages (TN: naïve = Panel A, TCM: central memory = Panel B, TEM: effector memory = Panel C, TEMRA: terminal effector memory = Panel D) in the peripheral blood of subjects vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, according to pre-infection (PI) (red) or no infection (blue). Analysis during vaccination: 0 = pre-vaccine; 1st: 1 month after the first dose; 2nd: 1 month after the second dose; 3rd: 6 months after the second dose; 4th: 1 month after the third dose. A non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare the evolution of antibodies of γδ T-cell subsets. The Mann–Whitney U test was used was used to compare the differences between pre-infection (PI) and no infection (No). Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Relationship between COVID-19 at some point during the vaccination period (COVID-19 post-vaccine (CPV)) (n = 25) and pre-vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2. (B) Post-vaccine COVID-19 after the first dose. (C) Post-vaccine COVID-19 after the second dose. (D) Post-vaccine COVID-19 after the third dose. (E,F) IgG and IgA according to CPV (COVID-19 post-vaccine), respectively. (G,H) Pre-vaccine αβ-γδ T-cell subset number according to CPV (COVID-19 post-vaccine). (I,J) αβ-γδ T-cell subset apoptosis pre-vaccine according to CPV (COVID-19 post-vaccine). The U test was used to compare the differences between CPV and not. Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (K,L) Relationship between γδ T cells and apoptosis (n = 25) (Pearson’s test was used). DN = double-negative (CD4-CD8-). (M) Pre-vaccine B (CD19+)-cell subset number according to CPV (COVID-19 post-vaccine).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Differentiation stages of αβ-γδ T-cell subset number and apoptosis pre-vaccine according to CPV (COVID-19 post-vaccine). TN: naïve = Panel A, TCM: central memory = Panel B, TEM: effector memory = Panel C, TEMRA: terminal effector memory = Panel D. Significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Similar articles

References

    1. Blann A.D., Heitmar R. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A Narrative Review. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2022;79:10426. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2022.10426. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Troiano G., Nardi A. Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public Health. 2021;194:245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zheng C., Shao W., Chen X., Zhang B., Wang G., Zhang W. Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: A literature review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022;114:252–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gutfreund M.C., Kobayashi T., Callado G.Y., Pardo I., Hsieh M.K., Lin V., Perencevich E.N., Salinas J.L., Edmond M.B., Mendonça E., et al. The effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines in the prevention of post-COVID conditions in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob. Steward. Healthc. Epidemiol. 2024;4:e54. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.42. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu C., Pang S., Liu J., Duan Q. Current Progress, Challenges and Prospects in the Development of COVID-19 Vaccines. Drugs. 2024;84:402–423. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02013-8. - DOI - PubMed