Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 15;13(10):1367.
doi: 10.3390/plants13101367.

What Was George Forrest's Plant Collection Journey like in China?

Affiliations

What Was George Forrest's Plant Collection Journey like in China?

Ke Shi et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Since the 16th century, Western countries have conducted extensive plant collections in Asia, particularly in China, driven by the need to collect botanical resources and foster academic development. These activities have not only significantly enriched the Western botanical specimen collections but have also had a profound impact on the development of related disciplines such as botany, ecology, and horticulture. During this process, a large number of renowned plant hunters emerged, whose discoveries and contributions are still remembered today. George Forrest (1873-1932) was one of these distinguished plant hunters. From 1904 to 1932, he visited China seven times to collect plants and became famous for the regional distinctiveness of the species he collected. However, due to the lack of systematic collection, organization, and analysis of specimens collected by Forrest, only a few species, such as the species Rhododendron, are well-known among the many species he introduced to the West. Furthermore, the personal collecting characteristics and the characteristic species collected by Forrest are also not clear. This limits a comprehensive understanding of the specimen collection history and impact of Forrest in China. Therefore, systematic organization and analysis of Forrest's plant specimens collected in China are crucial to understanding his impact on botanical classification, Rhododendrons introduction, global horticulture, and plant propagation. This study aims to systematically organize and analyze the plant specimens collected by George Forrest in China to investigate the family, genus, and species composition of the collected specimens and the seven collection expeditions of Forrest in China, as well as the time and altitude of these collections. Furthermore, it seeks to discuss Forrest's scientific contributions to the global spread of plants, the widespread application of the Rhododendron, and his impact on the development of modern gardens, providing a theoretical basis and data reference for related research and professional development. To this end, we extensively consulted important historical literature related to Forrest and systematically collected data from online specimen databases. The conclusions drawn from the available data include 38,603 specimens, with 26,079 collection numbers, belonging to 233 families, 1395 genera, and 5426 species, which account for 48.24%, 32.63%, and 14.17% of the plant families, genera, and species in China, respectively. Rhododendron specimens made up 17.20% of the specimens collected in this study. The collection locations cover three provinces or autonomous regions, 11 prefecture-level cities, and 25 counties. Furthermore, we found that Forrest's collections were concentrated in spring and summer, mainly in high-altitude areas, with 135 species found below 1500 m and 3754 species at 1500 m and above. Rhododendron specimens were mostly found above 3000 m.

Keywords: Rhododendron; ethnobotany; plant collection history; specimen collection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution map of the collected specimen number. (AP: Autonomous Prefecture, the color on the distribution map represents the number of specimens collected by Forrest and his team, with darker color indicating a higher number of collected specimens.).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forrest and his chief collector Zhao Chengzhang. Source: https://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/14188 (accessed on 20 April 2024).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forrest’s collectors were cutting up the massive Rhododendron. Source: https://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/14186 (accessed on 20 April 2024).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of specimens collected in seven collecting expeditions and their seasonal distribution. (Collection ID refers to the new collection number assigned to the plant specimens after recoding).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Altitude–Month Heatmap of specimen number.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Plant altitude and habitat analysis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Photos taken by George Forrest: (a) Primula pinnatifida photo taken by George Forrest in 1910. Source: https://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/14301, accessed on 24 April 2024. (b) A mule crossing the Cikai ropes. Source: https://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/14301, accessed on 24 April 2024.

References

    1. Lv L.Y., Zhao Y., Yu G.Q. Historical status and trends of grassland plant resource surveys at home and abroad. Heilongjiang Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2016;10:140–143.
    1. Liu L. The dissemination and influence of texts by Westerners in China accounting for environmental changes in China in modern times. J. Beijing For. Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2015;14:1–7.
    1. Gras A., Garnatje T., Ibanez N., Lopez-Pujol J., Nualart N., Valles J. Medicinal plant uses and names from the herbarium of Francesc Bolòs (1773–1844) J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017;204:142–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2017.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Svanberg I., Hällzon P., Ståhlberg S. Glimpses of Loptuq folk botany: Phytonyms and plant knowledge in Sven Hedin’s herbarium notes from the Lower Tarim River area as a source for ethnobiological research. Stud. Orient. Electron. 2019;7:96–119. doi: 10.23993/store.76475. - DOI
    1. Huang H. Plant diversity and conservation in China: Planning a strategic bioresource for a sustainable future. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2011;166:282–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01157.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources