Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;33(11):4167-4183.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.17293. Epub 2024 May 26.

Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for women with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review

Guilherme Tavares de Arruda  1 , Patricia Driusso  2 , Amanda Garcia de Godoy  1 , Ana Paula de Sousa  1 , Mariana Arias Avila  1
Affiliations

Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for women with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review

Guilherme Tavares de Arruda et al. J Clin Nurs. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Dysmenorrhea, or menstrual pain, is a subjective experience, and can only be assessed by patient-reported outcomes. These instruments should be reliable, valid and responsive.

Aim: To identify and critically appraise the available evidence for the measurement properties of specific patient-reported outcome measures used for dysmenorrhea.

Methods: The PRISMA statement was used to report this systematic review. Databases searched were PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar (April 2021; updated on February 2023). Original studies with primary data collection, with no restriction on language and publication date that reported psychometric properties of one or more dysmenorrhea-related patient-reported outcome measure. The literature searches, selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias were performed independently by two reviewers and followed the COSMIN guidelines.

Results: Thirty studies were analysed in this review, and 19 patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated. The instruments varied in relation to the measured construct and measurement properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness). The methodological quality of the studies and the quality of evidence of the patient-reported outcome measures were variable. Among the 13 studies that reported the development of patient-reported outcome measures, most had inadequate methodological quality, and the overall rating was insufficient or inconsistent.

Conclusions: The Dysmenorrhea Symptom Interference (DSI) scale was the only identified patient-reported outcome measure that has the potential to be recommended because of its sufficient rating combined with moderate quality of evidence for content validity. Future studies should further evaluate the measurement properties of the existing patient-reported outcome measures, or develop new patient-reported outcome measures following the COSMIN methodology.

Patient or public contribution: Not applicable as this is a systematic review.

Trial registration: PROSPERO protocol: CRD42021244410. Registration on April 22, 2021.

Keywords: chronic pain; menstrual pain; patient assessment; women's health.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abreu‐Sánchez, A., Ruiz‐Castillo, J., Onieva‐Zafra, M., Parra‐Fernández, M., & Fernández‐Martínez, E. (2020). Interference and impact of dysmenorrhea on the life of Spanish nursing students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186473
    1. Ameade, E. P. K. (2016). Menstrual pain assessment: Comparing Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) with Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) as pain measurement tools. International Journal of Women's Health and Wellness, 2(1):017‐021. https://doi.org/10.23937/2474‐1353/1510017
    1. Armour, M., Parry, K., Al‐Dabbas, M. A., Curry, C., Holmes, K., MacMillan, F., Ferfolja, T., & Smith, C. A. (2019). Self‐care strategies and sources of knowledge on menstruation in 12,526 young women with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One, 14(7), e0220103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220103
    1. Chen, C. X., Draucker, C. B., & Carpenter, J. S. (2018). What women say about their dysmenorrhea: A qualitative thematic analysis. BMC Women's Health, 18(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905‐018‐0538‐8
    1. Chen, C. X., Kwekkeboom, K. L., & Ward, S. E. (2015). Self‐report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea: A critical review. European Journal of Pain, 19(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.556

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources