Medical Implications of Restricting Abortions on Women Diagnosed With Fetal Anomalies Following the Overturn of Roe v. Wade: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 38800251
- PMCID: PMC11127699
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58994
Medical Implications of Restricting Abortions on Women Diagnosed With Fetal Anomalies Following the Overturn of Roe v. Wade: A Scoping Review
Abstract
This scoping review addresses the potential maternal health outcomes of abortion restrictions in the U.S. by studying and analyzing the reported effects of abortion bans or limitations globally. The goal was to examine the medical implications for pregnant women who are unable to abort fetuses that have severe medical anomalies due to imposed restrictions. EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published in English concerning the medical implications of abortion restrictions in any country prior to the overturn of Roe v. Wade in 2022. For the search criteria using Boolean operators, keywords included the terms "fetal anomaly," "abortion ban," and "implications." Inclusion criteria incorporated studies published between 1980 and 2021, and controlled experimental research studies aimed to evaluate interventions were excluded. This resulted in 469 records initially found. Duplicate records were removed, and two separate tier reviews were conducted. Eleven reviewers independently screened abstracts and titles of 332 records to ascertain eligibility. Eligibility included pregnant women diagnosed with fetal anomalies, women denied access to safe abortions, and the maternal and fetal medical impacts of this. Three reviewers in the second screening independently read 36 full articles to further assess eligibility, resulting in 14 articles in the final review. Findings from this study showed that abortion bans in countries around the world have led to health complications in women seeking illegal abortion services, a decline in maternal mental health, including stress and depression, various medical complications such as obstructed labor, and an increase in high-risk fetuses born with severe deficits. The findings of this review portend similar negative consequences to be experienced by women who are subject to stricter abortion laws in the U.S.
Keywords: abortion; abortion ban; congenital anomalies; fetal anomalies; health policy; reproductive rights; roe v. wade.
Copyright © 2024, Mellquist et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects and Proposed Countermeasures of Abortion Bans and Restrictions on People With Uteruses and Society.Cureus. 2022 Oct 4;14(10):e29906. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29906. eCollection 2022 Oct. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36348848 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.Cureus. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e32100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32100. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36601141 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Potential Impacts of Roe v. Wade repeal on Sexual and Reproductive Health in Sub-Saharan Africa.Public Health Chall. 2023 Jun 1;2(2):e88. doi: 10.1002/puh2.88. eCollection 2023 Jun. Public Health Chall. 2023. PMID: 40495873 Free PMC article.
-
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38551970 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines.Pediatr Res. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-03805-8. Online ahead of print. Pediatr Res. 2025. PMID: 39809859 Review.
References
-
- Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization. [ Apr; 2024 ];https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/19-1392/ Justia. 2021 597
-
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 505 U.S. 833. [ Apr; 2024 ]. 1992. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/505/833/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/505/833/ - PubMed
-
- State bans on abortion throughout pregnancy. [ Oct; 2023 ]. 2023. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-later-abo... https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-later-abo...
-
- Expecting the unexpected: perspectives on stillbirth and late termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. DiMiceli-Zsigmond M, Williams AK, Richardson MG. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:457–464. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources