Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 May 15:arXiv:2405.09646v1.

Protein folding as a jamming transition

Affiliations

Protein folding as a jamming transition

Alex T Grigas et al. ArXiv. .

Abstract

Proteins fold to a specific functional conformation with a densely packed hydrophobic core that controls their stability. We develop a geometric, yet all-atom model for proteins that explains the universal core packing fraction of ϕc=0.55 found in experimental measurements. We show that as the hydrophobic interactions increase relative to the temperature, a novel jamming transition occurs when the core packing fraction exceeds ϕc. The model also recapitulates the global structure of proteins since it can accurately refold to native-like structures from partially unfolded states.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
The nonbonded dimensionless pair potential V˜ij=Vij/ϵr plotted versus atomic separation r˜ij=rij/σij for purely-repulsive interactions (Eq. 1) (solid line) and attractive interactions (Eq. 5) (dashed line) and (b) the corresponding dimensionless force F˜ij=Fijσij/ϵr. The symbols represent the onset of repulsive interactions where r˜ij=1 and V˜ij=-V˜c=-Vc/ϵr (circles), the change in spring constant where r˜ij=r˜β=1+rβσij and F˜ij=-β˜ij=-βλijσij/ϵr (squares), and the separation above which the interactions are zero r˜ij=r˜α=1+rα/σij=1+α (triangles). (c) The difference Δf between the average fraction of backbone dihedral angle outliers (black circles) and side chain dihedral angle outliers (grey squares) between the HS model and proteins from a high-quality x-ray crystal structure database plotted versus the temperature T/ϵr at which the HS model proteins were simulated. Inset: The probability distribution of backbone dihedral angles P(φ,ψ) sampled by high-quality x-ray crystal structures of proteins. The colors from light to dark indicate increasing probability on a logarithmic scale. (d) Probability distribution of the average core packing fraction P(ϕ) in high-quality x-ray crystal structures of proteins calculated using the optimized HS atom sizes on a semi-log plot with a Gaussian fit (black dashed line).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
(a) The average core packing fraction ϕ plotted versus the attraction strength α2β for the HS+HP protein model for temperatures T/ϵr=10-6 (yellow), 10−7 (green), and 10−8 (blue) and α=0.5 (circles), 1.0 (squares), 1.5 (upward triangles), and 2.0 (downward triangles). The horizontal red dot-dashed line and cyan shading indicate the average and standard deviation of the core packing fraction in the high-resolution x-ray crystal structure data set. The black dashed lines indicate fits to Eq. 6. (b) The average repulsive potential energy per atom Vr/N plotted versus α2β. The black dashed lines indicate fits to Eq. 7. (c) Vr/N plotted versus ϕ. The vertical red dot-dashed line and cyan shading indicate the average and standard deviation of the core packing fraction in the high-resolution x-ray crystal structure data set. The black dashed lines indicate fits to Eq. 8.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(a) The vibrational density of states (VDOS) Dωn, where ωn is the frequency, of the Cα atoms in the HS+HP model at T/ϵr=10-8 for all α and β in Fig. 2. (b) Participation ratio prωn plotted versus ωn. The average total nonbonded repulsive potential energy per atom Vr/N increases from blue to red on a logarithmic scale.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
(a) CαRMSDΔf in Å between the HS+HP model proteins and the x-ray crystal structures averaged over 20 proteins plotted versus α2β when starting from the experimental structure for temperature T/ϵr=10-6 (yellow), 10−7 (green), and 10−8 (blue) and α=0.5 (circles), 1.0 (squares), 1.5 (upward triangles), and 2.0 (downward triangles). (b) Average CαRMSDΔf plotted versus the initial CαRMSDΔi in β for T/ϵr=10-7. The filled circles are colored by α=0.5-5.5 increasing from purple to yellow, and β is set so that α2β~T/ϵr. All-atom MD simulations of a single protein (PDBID: 2IGP) using the Amber99SB-ILDN force field are shown as grey squares. The red dashed line indicates Δf=Δi.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dill K. A., Dominant forces in protein folding, Biochemistry 29, 7133 (1990). - PubMed
    1. Bryngelson J. D. and Wolynes P. G., Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 84, 7524 (1987). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leopold P. E., Montal M., and Onuchic J. N., Protein folding funnels: A kinetic approach to the sequence-structure relationship, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89, 8721 (1992). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolynes P. G., Onuchic J. N., and Thirumalai D., Navigating the folding routes, Science 267, 1619 (1995). - PubMed
    1. Onuchic J. N., Luthey-Schulten Z., and Wolynes P. G., Theory of protein folding: The energy landscape perspective, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 48, 545 (1997). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources