Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep;54(9):786-794.
doi: 10.1111/hepr.14058. Epub 2024 May 27.

Current status and future perspectives of robotic liver surgery

Affiliations
Review

Current status and future perspectives of robotic liver surgery

Akihiko Soyama et al. Hepatol Res. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Robotic liver resection has been reported in case series since the early 2000s. The surgical robot is capable of precise operation using articulated forceps with seven degrees of freedom. The robot also eliminates tremors and provides a good surgical field with highly detailed 3D high-definition images. The clinical results demonstrating their usefulness have been increasing year by year. Initially, a shorter hospital stay was observed in comparison with open hepatectomy. Recent reports have also shown lower conversion and complication rates in comparison with laparoscopic hepatectomy. The clamp and crush method with bipolar forceps, sealing devices, ultrasonic shears, and the combined procedure of Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and robotic forceps as hybrid procedures have been reported as effective methods of parenchymal transection in robotic surgery. Theoretically, the advantages of the robotic platform allow for more complex liver resection around hilar structures and major blood vessels, as well as for vascular reconstruction or biliary reconstruction. The application of robotic liver surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, living donor hepatectomy, and living donor liver transplantation has been reported. Robotic liver surgery is becoming more popular for certain indications; however, it is important to further evaluate its long-term surgical and oncological outcomes and costs in comparison with conventional laparoscopic and open liver surgery, based on accumulated experience.

Keywords: cost‐effectiveness; hepatectomy; liver resection; liver transplantation; robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):777–784. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.7.777
    1. Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Ito N, Hasegawa Y, Takahara T. Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):732–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464‐012‐2547‐2
    1. Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Lapalorcia LM, Casciola L. Laparoscopic and robot‐assisted one‐stage resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):450–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534‐009‐0073‐y
    1. Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, Choi GH, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y, et al. International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(12):1432–1444. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i12.1432
    1. Liu R, Abu Hilal M, Wakabayashi G, Han HS, Palanivelu C, Boggi U, et al. International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(32):4815–4830. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i32.4815

LinkOut - more resources