Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 26;28(3):511-520.
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240034.

Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle

Affiliations
Review

Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle

Romualdo Sciorio et al. JBRA Assist Reprod. .

Abstract

Following the advancement of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technology, and the rationale to extend the culture to the blastocyst stage, performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET), gamete quality and assessment have acquired large relevance in ART. Embryo quality is strictly correlated with gametes quality and culture conditions. Oocyte maturity assessment is therefore imperative for fertilization and embryo evolution. Mature oocytes at the metaphase II stage result in a higher fertilization rate compared to immature oocytes. Indeed, oocyte morphology evaluation represents an important and challenging task that may serve as a valuable prognostic tool for future embryo development and implantation potential. Different grading systems have been reported to assess human embryos, however, in many cases, it is still a major challenge to select the single embryo to transfer with the highest implantation potential. Further, eSET has conferred a challenge to embryologists, who must try to enhance embryo culture and selection to provide an adequate success rate, whilst reducing the overall number of embryos transferred. Above the standard morphological assessment, there are several invasive or non-invasive approaches for embryo selection such as preimplantation genetic testing, time-lapse technology, proteomics and metabolomics, as well as oxygen utilization and analysis of oxidative stress in culture medium. This short review is not designed to be a comprehensive review of all possible features that may influence oocyte quality. It does give, however, a brief overview and describes the prognostic value of the morphological characteristics of human oocytes on their developmental capacity following ART treatments.

Keywords: healthy offspring; medically assisted reproduction; non-invasive assessment; oocyte biomechanical features; oocyte morphology; oocyte quality; pregnancy outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The process of meiosis with the formation of haploid gametes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albertini DF, Combelles CM, Benecchi E, Carabatsos MJ. Cellular basis for paracrine regulation of ovarian follicle development. Reproduction. 2001;121:647–653. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1210647. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azarkh D, Cao Y, Floehr J, Schnakenberg U. Viscoelastic Properties of Zona Pellucida of Oocytes Characterized by Transient Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy. Biosensors (Basel) 2023;13:442–442. doi: 10.3390/bios13040442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balaban B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Yakin K, Urman B. Severe cytoplasmic abnormalities of the oocyte decrease cryosurvival and subsequent embryonic development of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1778–1785. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barretta M, Cacciottola L, Hossay C, Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Impact of human ovarian tissue manipulation on follicles: evidence of a potential first wave of follicle activation during fertility preservation procedures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40:2769–2776. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02930-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blengini CS, Nguyen AL, Aboelenain M, Schindler K. Age-dependent integrity of the meiotic spindle assembly checkpoint in females requires Aurora kinase B. Aging Cell. 2021;20:e13489–e13489. doi: 10.1111/acel.13489. - DOI - PMC - PubMed