Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Jul;43(7):1375-1381.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04847-2. Epub 2024 May 27.

Multicenter comparison of Etest, Vitek2 and BD Phoenix to broth microdilution for beta-lactam susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumonia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Multicenter comparison of Etest, Vitek2 and BD Phoenix to broth microdilution for beta-lactam susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumonia

Steven Martens et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess performance of Etest®, Vitek®2 and BD Phoenix™ to determine the susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains to penicillin, ampicillin and cefotaxime.

Methods: Sixty unique S. pneumoniae challenge strains were selected to cover a wide range of penicillin, ampicillin and cefotaxime minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Strains were analyzed in four different Belgian laboratories. Etest® benzylpenicillin (BEN), ampicillin/amoxicillin (AMP) and cefotaxime (CTA) (bioMérieux), Vitek®2 AST-ST03 (bioMérieux) and BD Phoenix™ SMIC/ID-11 testing were each performed in two different labs. Results were compared to Sensititre® broth microdilution (BMD) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) results. MIC results were interpreted using EUCAST non-meningitis breakpoints (v 13.0).

Results: Essential agreement (EA) was ≥ 90% for all methods compared to BMD, except for Etest® BEN on Oxoid plate (58.3%), Etest® AMP (both on Oxoid (65.8%) and BD BBL plate (84.2%)). Categorical agreement (CA) for penicillin was only ≥ 90% for Vitek®2, for other methods CA ranged between 74 and 84%. CA for AMP was for all methods < 90% (range 75.8-88.3%) and CA for CTA was between 87 and 90% for all methods except for Etest on Oxoid plate (79.2%).

Conclusions: Our study indicates that Vitek®2 and BD Phoenix™ are reliable for providing accurate pneumococcal susceptibility results for BEN, AMP and CTA. Using Etest BEN or AMP on Oxoid plate carries a risk of underestimating the MIC and should be interpreted with caution, especially when the obtained MIC is 1 or 2 doubling dilutions below the S or R clinical breakpoint.

Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Beta-lactam; EUCAST breakpoints; Streptococcus pneumoniae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Correlation between BEN MICs for S. pneumoniae determined by BMD and by Etest (a and b), by Vitek®2 (c) and by BD Phoenix™ (d). The MIC values obtained by BMD are used as reference. The number of strains with MIC corresponding to BMD and 1-log2 dilution are indicated in darker and lighter grey squares, respectively. EUCAST breakpoints for indications other than meningitis are reported as solid black lines. VMEs and MEs are indicated in bold and red

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2022) Antimicrobial resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net) - Annual Epidemiological Report 2021. ECDC, Stockholm
    1. EUCAST (2019) Warning against the use of gradient tests for benzylpenicillin MIC in Streptococcus pneumoniae. https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Warnings/Wa.... Accessed 14 September 2023
    1. CLSI (2015) Verification of Commercial Microbial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Systems. 1st ed. CLSI guideline M52. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
    1. International Standard Organisation ISO 20776-2:2021 (2021) Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems_Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices. Part 2_Evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices against reference broth micro-dilution AFNOR. Genève
    1. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (2023) Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 13.0

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources