Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 27:26:e54095.
doi: 10.2196/54095.

Advances in the Application of AI Robots in Critical Care: Scoping Review

Affiliations

Advances in the Application of AI Robots in Critical Care: Scoping Review

Yun Li et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: In recent epochs, the field of critical medicine has experienced significant advancements due to the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). Specifically, AI robots have evolved from theoretical concepts to being actively implemented in clinical trials and applications. The intensive care unit (ICU), known for its reliance on a vast amount of medical information, presents a promising avenue for the deployment of robotic AI, anticipated to bring substantial improvements to patient care.

Objective: This review aims to comprehensively summarize the current state of AI robots in the field of critical care by searching for previous studies, developments, and applications of AI robots related to ICU wards. In addition, it seeks to address the ethical challenges arising from their use, including concerns related to safety, patient privacy, responsibility delineation, and cost-benefit analysis.

Methods: Following the scoping review framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review to delineate the breadth of research in this field of AI robots in ICU and reported the findings. The literature search was carried out on May 1, 2023, across 3 databases: PubMed, Embase, and the IEEE Xplore Digital Library. Eligible publications were initially screened based on their titles and abstracts. Publications that passed the preliminary screening underwent a comprehensive review. Various research characteristics were extracted, summarized, and analyzed from the final publications.

Results: Of the 5908 publications screened, 77 (1.3%) underwent a full review. These studies collectively spanned 21 ICU robotics projects, encompassing their system development and testing, clinical trials, and approval processes. Upon an expert-reviewed classification framework, these were categorized into 5 main types: therapeutic assistance robots, nursing assistance robots, rehabilitation assistance robots, telepresence robots, and logistics and disinfection robots. Most of these are already widely deployed and commercialized in ICUs, although a select few remain under testing. All robotic systems and tools are engineered to deliver more personalized, convenient, and intelligent medical services to patients in the ICU, concurrently aiming to reduce the substantial workload on ICU medical staff and promote therapeutic and care procedures. This review further explored the prevailing challenges, particularly focusing on ethical and safety concerns, proposing viable solutions or methodologies, and illustrating the prospective capabilities and potential of AI-driven robotic technologies in the ICU environment. Ultimately, we foresee a pivotal role for robots in a future scenario of a fully automated continuum from admission to discharge within the ICU.

Conclusions: This review highlights the potential of AI robots to transform ICU care by improving patient treatment, support, and rehabilitation processes. However, it also recognizes the ethical complexities and operational challenges that come with their implementation, offering possible solutions for future development and optimization.

Keywords: AI; ICU; artificial intelligence; critical care medicine; intensive care unit; robotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram of the screening process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Types of robots available in an intelligent intensive care unit (ICU). CPR: cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bobrow DG, Stefik MJ. Perspectives on artificial intelligence programming. Science. 1986 Feb 28;231(4741):951–7. doi: 10.1126/science.231.4741.951.231/4741/951 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haug CJ, Drazen JM. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical medicine, 2023. N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1201–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2302038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE. Response: neuronal coding and robotics. Science. 1987 Jul 17;237(4812):301. doi: 10.1126/science.237.4812.301.237/4812/301 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKendrick M, Yang S, McLeod GA. The use of artificial intelligence and robotics in regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76 Suppl 1:171–81. doi: 10.1111/anae.15274. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.15274 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Javaid M, Haleem A, Vaishya R, Bahl S, Suman R, Vaish A. Industry 4.0 technologies and their applications in fighting COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):419–22. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.032. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32344370 S1871-4021(20)30094-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types