Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;96(7):1812-1821.
doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03260-x. Epub 2024 May 27.

Serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin: a new promising biomarker for cow's milk allergy diagnosis

Affiliations

Serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin: a new promising biomarker for cow's milk allergy diagnosis

Wael A Bahbah et al. Pediatr Res. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Cow's Milk Allergy (CMA) diagnosis is often a challenge due to the non-specific nature of symptoms and lack of a confirmatory diagnostic test. To our knowledge no previous studies investigated serum Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin (sEDN) in CMA. So, we aimed to assess the role of sEDN in CMA diagnosis.

Methods: Forty-five infants with CMA were compared to 45 infants with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and 45 healthy controls. For all participants, Cow's Milk-related Symptom Score (CoMiSS) was documented, and sEDN level with hematological parameters were measured before starting elimination diet.

Results: Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve identified sEDN > 14 ng/mL and CoMiSS > 9 as the optimal cut-off points to discriminate CMA from other groups with sensitivity 86.67%, 97.78% and specificity 60.00%, 78.89% respectively. Additionally, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (80.0% and 78.89%) among hematological parameters. Although CoMiSS and ANC showed a significant positive correlation with sEDN in CMA group, CoMiSS was the only significant predictor for sEDN in multivariate linear regression.

Conclusions: sEDN showed high sensitivity in discriminating infants with and without CMA. Therefore, it is suggested as a potential biomarker for CMA diagnosis. Also, ANC should be closely monitored in these infants.

Impact: CMA presents with high heterogeneity, which complicates the diagnosis especially non-IgE-mediated and mixed types. So, oral food challenge continues to be the gold standard for its diagnosis. ROC curve identified CoMiSS > 9 as the best cut-off point to identify CMA. However, CoMiSS is a good awareness tool for CMA but not a diagnostic tool. sEDN level was significantly higher in infants with CMA with a good diagnostic performance in differentiating them than those without CMA. So, it is suggested as a potential biomarker for CMA diagnosis. ANC could have a role in CMA diagnosis and differentiating it from FGIDs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of the Menoufia Faculty of Medicine in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of Principles (ID number : 11/2022 PEDI 23). Our participants completed the study after a written consent from their parents/guardians. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all the legally authorized representatives of participants included in the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. ROC curve for total CoMiSS.
ROC curve identified the score of > 9 as the best cut-off point to discriminate CMA group (n = 45) vs FGIDs and Control groups (n = 90). Area under the curve (AUC): 0.964, with a sensitivity of 97.78%, specificity of 78.89%, PPV of 69.8, and NPV of 98.6.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. ROC curve for hematological parameters.
ROC curve analysis of hematological parameters to discriminate CMA group (n = 45) vs FGIDs and Control groups (n = 90) revealed high sensitivity and specificity of ANC (sensitivity 80%, specificity 78.89%, and AUC: 0.909). In contrast, NLR, TLC, MPV and ALC showed low sensitivity and specificity (sensitivity 0.71.11%, 66.67%, 62.22% and 60%, specificity 58.89%, 53.33%, 53.33%, and 53.33% respectively).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Serum Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin level among the 3 studied groups.
Median (IQR) of sEDN (ng/mL) in the 3 studied groups.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. ROC curve for serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin.
ROC curve identified the score of > 14 ng/mL as the best cut-off point to discriminate CMA group (n = 45) vs FGIDs and Control groups (n = 90). Area under the curve (AUC): 0.754, with 86.67% sensitivity, 60.00% specificity, PPV of 52.0, and NPV of 98.6.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Correlation between Serum Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin and CoMiSS.
A significant positive spearman’s coefficient correlation was observed between sEDN and CoMiSS

Similar articles

References

    1. Roca, M. et al. Fecal Calprotectin and Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin in Children with Non-IgE-Mediated Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy. J. Clin. Med.10, 1595 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bajerova, K. et al. The Cow’s Milk-Related Symptom Score (CoMiSS™): A Useful Awareness Tool. Nutrients14, 2059 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vitaliti G., Cimino C., Coco A., Praticò A. D., Lionetti E. The immunopathogenesis of cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA). Ital J Pediatr. 2012 Jul 23;38:35. Erratum in: Ital J Pediatr. 2014;39:82. Giovanna, Vitaliti [corrected to Vitaliti, Giovanna]; Carla, Cimino [corrected to Cimino, Carla]; Alfina, Coco [corrected to Coco, Alfina]; Deoenico, Praticò Andrea [corrected to Praticò, Andrea Domenico]; Elena, Lionetti [corrected to Lionetti, Elena]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muraro, A. et al. European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. EAACI food allergy and anaphylaxis guidelines: managing patients with food allergy in the community. Allergy69, 1046–57 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Koletzko, S. et al. European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. Diagnostic approach and management of cow’s-milk protein allergy in infants and children: ESPGHAN GI Committee practical guidelines. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr.55, 221–9 (2012). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources