Influence of intramuscular steroid receptor content and fiber capillarization on skeletal muscle hypertrophy
- PMID: 38802727
- DOI: 10.1111/sms.14668
Influence of intramuscular steroid receptor content and fiber capillarization on skeletal muscle hypertrophy
Abstract
Multiple intramuscular variables have been proposed to explain the high variability in resistance training induced muscle hypertrophy across humans. This study investigated if muscular androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor α (ERα) and β (ERβ) content and fiber capillarization are associated with fiber and whole-muscle hypertrophy after chronic resistance training. Male (n = 11) and female (n = 10) resistance training novices (22.1 ± 2.2 years) trained their knee extensors 3×/week for 10 weeks. Vastus lateralis biopsies were taken at baseline and post the training period to determine changes in fiber type specific cross-sectional area (CSA) and fiber capillarization by immunohistochemistry and, intramuscular AR, ERα and ERβ content by Western blotting. Vastus lateralis volume was quantified by MRI-based 3D segmentation. Vastus lateralis muscle volume significantly increased over the training period (+7.22%; range: -1.82 to +18.8%, p < 0.0001) but no changes occurred in all fiber (+1.64%; range: -21 to +34%, p = 0.869), type I fiber (+1.33%; range: -24 to +41%, p = 0.952) and type II fiber CSA (+2.19%; range: -23 to +29%, p = 0.838). However, wide inter-individual ranges were found. Resistance training increased the protein expression of ERα but not ERβ and AR, and the increase in ERα content was positively related to changes in fiber CSA. Only for the type II fibers, the baseline capillary-to-fiber-perimeter index was positively related to type II fiber hypertrophy but not to whole muscle responsiveness. In conclusion, an upregulation of ERα content and an adequate initial fiber capillarization may be contributing factors implicated in muscle fiber hypertrophy responsiveness after chronic resistance training.
Keywords: androgen receptor; capillarization; estrogen receptor; muscle fiber hypertrophy; muscle hypertrophy.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Zurlo F, Larson K, Bogardus C, Ravussin E. Skeletal muscle metabolism is a major determinant of resting energy expenditure. J Clin Invest. 1990;86(5):1423‐1427. doi:10.1172/JCI114857
-
- Ratamess NA, Alvar BA, Evetoch TK, et al. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(3):687‐708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670
-
- Hubal MJ, Gordish‐Dressman H, Thompson PD, et al. Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(6):964‐972. doi:10.1016/s0162-0908(08)70354-4
-
- Haun CT, Vann CG, Mobley CB, et al. Pre‐training skeletal muscle fiber size and predominant fiber type best predict hypertrophic responses to 6 weeks of resistance training in to previously trained young men. Front Physiol. 2019;26(10):297. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00297
-
- Van Vossel K, Hardeel J, Van de Casteele F, et al. Can muscle typology explain the inter‐individual variability in resistance training adaptations? J Physiol. 2023;601(12):2307‐2327. doi:10.1113/JP284442
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous