Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 27;22(1):509.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05329-x.

Identification of epigenetic silencing of the SFRP2 gene in colorectal cancer as a clinical biomarker and molecular significance

Affiliations

Identification of epigenetic silencing of the SFRP2 gene in colorectal cancer as a clinical biomarker and molecular significance

Hatim Boughanem et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: Several studies have suggested secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2) gene as a potential clinical biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its diagnostic role remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the significance of SFRP2 methylation levels in a large cohort of biological specimens (including blood, adipose and colonic tissues) from patients with CRC, thereby potentially identifying new biomarker utility.

Methods: We examined the expression (by qPCR) and methylation status (by 450 K DNA array and DNA pyrosequencing) of the SFRP2 gene in healthy participants (N = 110, aged as 53.7 (14.2), 48/62 males/females) and patients with CRC (N = 85, aged 67.7 (10.5), 61/24 males/females), across different biological tissues, and assessing its potential as a biomarker for CRC. Additionally, we investigated the effect of recombinant human SFRP2 (rhSFRP2) as a therapeutic target, on cell proliferation, migration, and the expression of key genes related to carcinogenesis and the Wnt pathway.

Results: Our findings revealed that SFRP2 promoter methylation in whole blood could predict cancer stage (I + II vs. III + IV) (AUC = 0.653), lymph node invasion (AUC = 0.692), and CRC recurrence (AUC = 0.699) in patients with CRC (all with p < 0.05). Furthermore, we observed a global hypomethylation of SFRP2 in tumors compared to the adjacent area (p < 0.001). This observation was validated in the TCGA-COAD and TCGA-READ cohorts, demonstrating overall hypermethylation (both with p < 0.001) and low expression (p < 0.001), as shown in publicly available scRNA-Seq data. Notably, neoadjuvant-treated CRC patients exhibited lower SFRP2 methylation levels compared to untreated patients (p < 0.05) and low promoter SFRP2 methylation in untreated patients was associated with poor overall survival (p < 0.05), when compared to high methylation. Finally, treatment with 5 µg of rhSFRP2 treatment in CRC cells (HCT116 cells) inhibited cell proliferation (p < 0.001) and migration (p < 0.05), and downregulated the expression of AXIN2 (p < 0.01), a gene involved in Wnt signaling pathway.

Conclusions: These findings establish promoter methylation of the SFRP2 gene as a prognostic candidate in CRC when assessed in blood, and as a therapeutic prognostic candidate in tumors, potentially valuable in clinical practice. SFRP2 also emerges as a therapeutic option, providing new clinical and therapeutical avenues.

Keywords: SRFP2; Colorectal cancer biomarkers; DNA methylation; Promoter methylation; Wnt signaling pathway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Promoter SFRP2 methylation in whole blood as a biomarker for colorectal cancer. A We measured the promoter methylation of SFRP2 gene from healthy participants (N = 31) and patients with CRC (N = 62) (p = 0.220). B Kaplan–Meier curve comparing the median of the SFRP2 promoter methylation as low and high methylation. The significance of differences is evaluated with the Log-rank test. We measured the promoter methylation of SFRP2 gene from patients with CRC in C early stage (I + II) (N = 42) and late stage (III + IV) (N = 39), (p = 0.044) D absence (N = 44) and presence (N = 35) of lymph node invasion (p = 0.014) and E absence (N = 58) and presence (N = 24) of recurrence (p = 0.013). Asterisks indicate significant differences between the groups according to the Mann Whitney test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). F, G and H indicate ROC curve of stage (F), lymph node invasion (G) and Recurrence (H) in three models. Model 1 indicate SFRP2 methylation. Model 2 indicates clinical variables, such as age, sex, BMI, HDL, triglycerides, and tumor location. Model 3 includes Model 1 + Model 2. AUC Area under curve, CRC colorectal cancer, ROC receiver operating characteristic curve, Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagnostic and prognostic value of SFRP2 methylation in tumor tissue from colorectal cancer. A Global β methylation was done with significant CpG sites between tumor and NAT. The CpG sites included in the global SFRP2 methylation in colon tissue in our participants were: cg14289246, cg05961809, cg23292160, cg25775322, cg23207990, cg22178613, cg10318528, cg11354906, cg00082664, cg03202804, cg05874561, cg04965141, cg25645268, cg14330641, cg23121156, cg06549216, cg10942078, cg20881942, cg23714408, cg05164933, cg14063488. B SFRP2 expression in colon samples from NAT (N = 11) and tumor area(N = 16). C Global β methylation was done with significant CpG sites between tumor and NAT in the TCGA-COAD. D SFRP2 expression in colon samples from NAT (N = 51) and tumor area (N = 308) in the TCGA-COAD cohort. E Global β methylation was done with significant CpG sites between tumor and NAT in the TCGA-READ. F SFRP2 expression in colon samples from NAT (N = 10) and tumor area(N = 94) in the TCGA-READ cohort. G Single cell RNA-seq analysis of SFRP2 gene in NAT, tumor core and tumor border. SFRP2 was mostly expressed in NAT and a small fraction of tumor core, in stromal cells and myofibroblasts. H We measured the promoter methylation of SFRP2 gene from patients with CRC no treated (N = 57) and treated (N = 24) with neoadjuvant therapy. I Kaplan–Meier curve comparing the median of the SFRP2 promoter methylation as low and high methylation in non-treated patients with CRC. The significance of differences is evaluated with the Log-rank test. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the groups according to the Mann Whitney test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). COAD colon adenocarcinoma, NAT normal adjacent area, READ rectum adenocarcinoma, TCGA The cancer genome atlas
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
SFRP2 inhibit cell proliferation and migration, through decreasing AXIN2 expression. A promoter methylation of SFRP2 in HCT116 cells. B Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at the concentration of 50.000 cell/well. Cells were treated with 1, 5 and 10 µM of AZA (5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine), during 72 h. SFRP2 gene expression was measured using qPCR and Probe qPCR kit (Takara, Spain). Gene normalization was used by PPIA. C Cells were treated at crescent concentration of rhSFRP2 at 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2.5 and 5 µg/mL of rhSFRP2 during 48 h. D wound healing Assay was conducted in the presence of 5 µg/mL of rhSFRP2. EH gene expression in cell treated with vehicle or with 5 µg/mL of rhSFRP2 of AXIN2, CTNNB1, TIAM1 and VEGF. AZA azacytidine, CTNNB1 beta-catenin, ND No Detected, PPIA Peptidylprolyl Isomerase A, rhSFRP2 recombinant human secreted frizzled related Protein 2, TIAM1 T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 1, VEGR Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

    1. Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiang H, Zhou S, Li G. Novel biomarkers used for early diagnosis and tyrosine kinase inhibitors as targeted therapies in colorectal cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2023 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1189799. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrelli F, et al. Prognostic survival associated with left-sided vs right-sided colon cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):211. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. You JS, Jones PA. Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell. 2012;22(1):9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadikovic B, Al-Romaih K, Squire J, Zielenska M. Cause and consequences of genetic and epigenetic alterations in human cancer. Curr Genomics. 2008;9(6):394–408. doi: 10.2174/138920208785699580. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types