Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 23;14(5):e058625.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058625.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Affiliations

Adverse pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Scholarstica Chukwuemeka et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Different diagnostic criteria are used for GDM, and it is not clear how these affect the reported prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This protocol is for a systematic review to describe and compare the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in GDM using the different diagnostic criteria applied in various countries/regions of the world.

Methods and analysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis will be carried out. A comprehensive search of observational studies that report the outcomes of interest to this review from 2010 to 2021 will be conducted. We will search the major electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, CINHAL and Google Scholar, and screen references of included studies for additional studies. Meta-analyses will be performed, if there is low heterogeneity, and pooled estimates per outcome reported. We will use the bias-adjusted inverse variance heterogeneity model and random effects models, depending on the heterogeneity observed, to pool prevalence estimates and perform subgroup analyses by region, by age group, by diagnostic criteria and by GDM screening method if sufficient data are available. We will also compare the prevalence of adverse outcomes by diagnostic method and report prevalence ratios. We will report 95% confidence estimates for all estimates.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as the review uses published data. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020155061.

Keywords: diabetes & endocrinology; diabetes in pregnancy; public health; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Diagnostic criteria and classification of Hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy. World Health Organization. Geneva. 2013. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/85975 Available. - PubMed
    1. Vounzoulaki E, Khunti K, Abner SC, et al. Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ . 2020;22:m1361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1361. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chivese T, Norris SA, Levitt NS. High prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and insulin resistance 6 years after hyperglycemia first detected in pregnancy in Cape town, South Africa. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019;7:e000740. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000740. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behboudi-Gandevani S, Amiri M, Bidhendi Yarandi R, et al. The impact of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes on its prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11:11. doi: 10.1186/s13098-019-0406-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Damm P, Houshmand-Oeregaard A, Kelstrup L, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term consequences for mother and offspring: a view from Denmark. Diabetologia. 2016;59:1396–9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-3985-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources