Information-seeking behaviour of primary care clinicians in Singapore at the point-of-care: A qualitative study
- PMID: 38804103
- PMCID: PMC11649596
- DOI: 10.1111/hir.12535
Information-seeking behaviour of primary care clinicians in Singapore at the point-of-care: A qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Clinicians' information-seeking behaviours impact patient care quality. Earlier studies indicated that barriers to accessing information deter clinicians from seeking answers to clinical questions.
Objectives: To explore primary care clinicians' information-seeking behaviour at point-of-care, focusing on when and how they seek answers to clinical questions.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 clinicians after clinical sessions to investigate their information-seeking habits. Follow-up interviews were conducted after a week for those intending to address unanswered queries.
Results: Two thirds of clinicians encountered questions during care, with nearly three quarters resolving them during the session. Colleagues, guidelines and online platforms were common information sources, with smartphones being used to access Google, WhatsApp or UpToDate®. Facilitators included reliable sources and the drive to confirm knowledge, while barriers included ineffective search methods and high workload. Despite challenges, most clinicians expressed satisfaction with their information-seeking process.
Discussion: The findings underscore the increasing use of smartphones for accessing clinical information among Singaporean primary care clinicians and suggest the need for tailored training programmes and guidelines to optimise information-seeking practices.
Conclusion: Insights from this study can inform the development of training programmes and guidelines aimed at improving information-seeking practices among primary care clinicians, potentially enhancing patient care quality.
Keywords: Asia, south east; Mobile health (M‐Health); clinical guidelines; clinical questions; digital information resources; evidence‐based medicine; evidence‐based nursing; information literacy; internet access; primary care.
© 2024 The Authors Health Information and Libraries Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Health Libraries Group.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared that they have no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Identifying primary care clinicians' preferences for, barriers to, and facilitators of information-seeking in clinical practice in Singapore: a qualitative study.BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 18;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02429-x. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38762445 Free PMC article.
-
Clinician Attitudes and Perceptions of Point-of-Care Information Resources and Their Integration Into Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 26;13:e60191. doi: 10.2196/60191. JMIR Med Inform. 2025. PMID: 40418791 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12):B5405. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 29206099
-
Clinical information seeking behavior of physicians: A systematic review.Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104144. Epub 2020 Apr 18. Int J Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 32334400
-
Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):1129-1140. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz065. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31127830 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Braun, L. , Wiesman, F. , den Herik Van, H. , & Hasman, A. (2006). Avoiding literature overload in the medical domain. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 124, 497–502. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources