Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 15;13(2):14.
doi: 10.3390/biotech13020014.

Challenges for the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring in the European Union Imposed by Novel Applications of Genetically Modified and Genome-Edited Organisms

Affiliations
Review

Challenges for the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring in the European Union Imposed by Novel Applications of Genetically Modified and Genome-Edited Organisms

Marion Dolezel et al. BioTech (Basel). .

Abstract

Information on the state of the environment is important to achieve the objectives of the European Green Deal, including the EU's Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. The existing regulatory provisions for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) foresee an obligatory post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of potential adverse effects upon release into the environment. So far, GMO monitoring activities have focused on genetically modified crops. With the advent of new genomic techniques (NGT), novel GMO applications are being developed and may be released into a range of different, non-agricultural environments with potential implications for ecosystems and biodiversity. This challenges the current monitoring concepts and requires adaptation of existing monitoring programs to meet monitoring requirements. While the incorporation of existing biodiversity monitoring programs into GMO monitoring at the national level is important, additional monitoring activities will also be required. Using case examples, we highlight that monitoring requirements for novel GMO applications differ from those of GM crop plants previously authorized for commercial use in the European Union.

Keywords: European Union; genetic modification; genome editing; new genomic techniques; post-market environmental monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiving environments of novel GMO applications compared to GM crops (own drawing).

References

    1. European Commission The European Green Deal: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM/2019/640 Final. 2019. [(accessed on 15 December 2023)]. Available online: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/eu....
    1. Salvan M.G., Bertoni D., Cavicchioli D., Bocchi S. Agri-Environmental Indicators: A Selected Review to Support Impact Assessment of New EU Green Deal Policies. Agronomy. 2022;12:798. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12040798. - DOI
    1. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms and Repealing Council Directive 90/220/EC. 2001. [(accessed on 13 May 2024)]. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2001/18/oj.
    1. European Commission GMO Register. [(accessed on 15 December 2023)]. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/plants/genetically-modified-organisms/gmo-regi....
    1. Ku H.-K., Ha S.-H. Improving Nutritional and Functional Quality by Genome Editing of Crops: Status and Perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;11:577313. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.577313. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources