Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;14(3):729-738.
doi: 10.3390/clinpract14030058.

Public Perceptions of Rotator Cuff Tears

Affiliations

Public Perceptions of Rotator Cuff Tears

V V N Manohar Devarasetty et al. Clin Pract. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCTs) impact 25% of those over 60 and 50% over 80; however, minimal data exists on public understanding; (2) Methods: The primary outcome was to determine the public's baseline understanding of RCTs utilizing a 36-question survey regarding anatomy and function, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment options, and expectations. Secondarily, we evaluated the effect of an educational video and informational handout created by the authors to improve understanding. Participants ≥ 18 years were recruited from the senior author's clinic and online discussion platforms over a 5-month period; (3) Results: Baseline surveys were completed by 382 individuals: 56% men, 64% Caucasian, 27% with at least a master's degree, and 56% with very little or no RCT knowledge. Mean correct answer scores improved from 47% to 68% posteducational intervention (p < 0.001). Males, higher education level, healthcare experience, and a higher self-rated understanding of RCTs were significantly correlated with higher survey performance (p < 0.001); (4) Conclusions: The public's knowledge of RCTs at baseline was poor, with demographic factors correlating with survey performance. The educational intervention effectively enhanced participants' understanding. By focusing on common misconceptions, this data can help clinicians align patient expectations and enhance patient outcomes.

Keywords: injury; perception; public understanding; rotator cuff; shoulder; tear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Low diagram for study participants.

References

    1. Minagawa H., Yamamoto N., Abe H., Fukuda M., Seki N., Kikuchi K., Kijima H., Itoi E. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village. J. Orthop. 2013;10:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yamamoto A., Takagishi K., Osawa T., Yanagawa T., Nakajima D., Shitara H., Kobayashi T. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2010;19:116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tashjian R.Z. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin. Sports Med. 2012;31:589–604. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wani Z., Abdulla M., Habeebullah A., Kalogriantis S. Rotator cuff tears: Review of epidemiology, clinical assessment and operative treatment. Trauma. 2016;18:190–204. doi: 10.1177/1460408615596770. - DOI
    1. Colvin A.C., Egorova N., Harrison A.K., Moskowitz A., Flatow E.L. National trends in rotator cuff repair. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2012;94:227–233. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00739. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources