Methodological considerations in meta-analysis: evaluating RCTs, NRS, and crossover trials for electrical impedance tomography in PEEP titration
- PMID: 38805041
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07462-z
Methodological considerations in meta-analysis: evaluating RCTs, NRS, and crossover trials for electrical impedance tomography in PEEP titration
References
-
- Gu W-J (2024) Concern for meta-analysis combining randomized parallel and cross-over trials. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07426-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Songsangvorn N, Xu Y, Lu C, Rotstein O, Brochard L, Slutsky AS et al (2024) Electrical impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07362-2 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Jimenez JV, Munroe E, Weirauch AJ, Fiorino K, Culter CA, Nelson K et al (2023) Electric impedance tomography-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power in ARDS: a randomized crossover pilot trial. Crit Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04315-x - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Higgins JP, Li T, Sterne J (2021) Revised cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) additional considerations for crossover trials. https://www.riskofbias.info/welcome/rob-2-0-tool/rob-2-for-crossover-trials . Accessed 9 May 2023
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources