Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Jul;131(1):117-125.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02692-w. Epub 2024 May 28.

The road to tailored adjuvant chemotherapy for all four non-pancreatic periampullary cancers: An international multimethod cohort study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The road to tailored adjuvant chemotherapy for all four non-pancreatic periampullary cancers: An international multimethod cohort study

Bas A Uijterwijk et al. Br J Cancer. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Despite differences in tumour behaviour and characteristics between duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC), the intestinal (AmpIT) and pancreatobiliary (AmpPB) subtype of ampullary adenocarcinoma and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on these cancers, as well as the optimal ACT regimen, has not been comprehensively assessed. This study aims to assess the influence of tailored ACT on DAC, dCCA, AmpIT, and AmpPB.

Patients and methods: Patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary adenocarcinoma were identified and collected from 36 tertiary centres between 2010 - 2021. Per non-pancreatic periampullary tumour type, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and the main relevant regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy were compared. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

Results: The study included a total of 2866 patients with DAC (n = 330), AmpIT (n = 765), AmpPB (n = 819), and dCCA (n = 952). Among them, 1329 received ACT, and 1537 did not. ACT was associated with significant improvement in OS for AmpPB (P = 0.004) and dCCA (P < 0.001). Moreover, for patients with dCCA, capecitabine mono ACT provided the greatest OS benefit compared to gemcitabine (P = 0.004) and gemcitabine - cisplatin (P = 0.001). For patients with AmpPB, no superior ACT regime was found (P > 0.226). ACT was not associated with improved OS for DAC and AmpIT (P = 0.113 and P = 0.445, respectively).

Discussion: Patients with resected AmpPB and dCCA appear to benefit from ACT. While the optimal ACT for AmpPB remains undetermined, it appears that dCCA shows the most favourable response to capecitabine monotherapy. Tailored adjuvant treatments are essential for enhancing prognosis across all four non-pancreatic periampullary adenocarcinomas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Methodology with summary of inclusions and comparisons.
ISGACA International Study Group on Non-pancreatic Periampullary Cancer, ACT adjuvant chemotherapy, 5FU/cap 5-fluorouracil or Capecitabine mono, Fluor+plat fluoropyrimidine + platinum combination, Gem Gemcitabine monotherapy, Cap. Capecitabine, Gem+Cis Gemcitabine + Cisplatin. The bold figure names include significant differences (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Duodenal adenocarcinoma.
a (left): yes vs no adjuvant chemotherapy after propensity-score matching; b (right): 5FU/Cap. Mono vs. Fluoropyrimidine + Platinum vs. Gemcitabine mono. Duodenum AC Duodenum adenocarcinoma, Adjuvant CT Adjuvant chemotherapy, 5FU 5-fluorouracil, Cap Capecitabin, Flu Fluoropyrimidine, Plat Platinum, Gem Gemcitabine.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Ampullary adenocarcinoma intestinal subtype.
a (left): yes vs no adjuvant chemotherapy after propensity-score matching; b (right): 5FU/Cap. Mono vs. Fluoropyrimidine + Platinum vs. Gemcitabine mono. Adjuvant CT Adjuvant chemotherapy, 5FU 5-fluorouracil, Cap. Capecitabin, Flu Fluoropyrimidine, Plat, Platinum, Gem Gemcitabine.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Ampullary adenocarcinoma pancreatobiliary.
a (left): yes vs no adjuvant chemotherapy after propensity-score matching; b (right): 5FU/Cap. Mono vs. Fluoropyrimidine + Platinum vs. Gemcitabine mono. Amp. Pancreatobiliary, Ampullary adenocarcinoma pancreatobiliary subtype, Adjuvant CT Adjuvant chemotherapy, 5FU 5-fluorouracil, Cap. Capecitabin, Flu Fluoropyrimidine, Plat Platinum, Gem Gemcitabine.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Distal cholangiocarcinoma.
a (left): yes vs no adjuvant chemotherapy after propensity-score matching; b (right): capecitabine vs gemcitabine vs gemcitabine-cisplatin. Distal cholangioCA distal cholangiocarcinoma, Adjuvant CT Adjuvant chemotherapy, Cap capecitabine, Gem gemcitabine, Gem-Cis gemcitabine + cisplatin.

References

    1. Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T, Kim GE, Krasinskas A, Balci S, et al. Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1592–608. - PubMed
    1. Lerch MM, Domschke W. Abraham Vater of the ampulla (papilla) of Vater. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:379. - PubMed
    1. Sarmiento JM, Nagomey DM, Sarr MG, Farnell MB. Periampullary cancers: are there differences? Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81:543–55. - PubMed
    1. Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, Smyrk TC, Zhang L, Qin R, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Ann Surg. 2008;247:456–62. - PubMed
    1. Han SS, Jang JY, Kim SW, Kim WH, Lee KU, Park YH. Analysis of long-term survivors after surgical resection for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2006;32:271–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources