Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Dec;48(23):5007-5017.
doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04090-2. Epub 2024 May 28.

In Vivo Comparison of the Efficacy and Duration of Local Antibiotics on Smooth, Textured and Polyurethane Implant Surfaces

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In Vivo Comparison of the Efficacy and Duration of Local Antibiotics on Smooth, Textured and Polyurethane Implant Surfaces

Ebubekir Karakas et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Capsular contracture is one of the most common complications after breast surgery involving silicone implants. The most likely cause of this condition is biofilm formation. In this study, the efficacy of local antibiotherapy against biofilm formation on implant surfaces was investigated.

Methods: Thirty-six rats were divided into six groups. Three pockets were created on the dorsum of each rat, and 1 × 2 cm implant surface samples from smooth, polyurethane and textured implants were randomly placed into pockets. All samples were inoculated with staphylococcus epidermidis. In groups 1-2-3, inoculated samples were placed into the pockets and removed after 1, 6 and 24 h, respectively. In groups 4-5-6, inoculated samples immersed with rifamycin were placed and removed after 1, 6 and 24 h, respectively. Bacterial load was measured with plate count method.

Results: Bacterial load was lower in groups 4-5-6 than in groups 1-2-3 (p < 0.05). In groups 4-5-6, bacterial load was lower for polyurethane than for textured surfaces at all time points (1, 6 and 24 h; p < 0.05). Again, in groups 4-5-6, bacterial load was lower for smooth than for textured surfaces at 24 h (p < 0.05). In groups 4-5-6, bacterial load was lower for polyurethane than for smooth surfaces at all time points, but difference was not statistically significant (1, 6 and 24 h; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The results suggest that local antibiotic therapy was effective in reducing the bacterial load on all surfaces. The effectiveness of local rifamycin on the polyurethane surface was higher, and the duration of activity was longer than other surfaces.

No level assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Keywords: Antibiotics; BIA-ALCL; Bacteria; Biofilm; Breast implants; Microorganism; Polyurethane textured smooth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and publication of this article. Ethical Approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the Gazi University Local Ethical Committee of Animal Experiments (Approval ID: G.U.ET-20.027). Informed Consent: For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Smooth (S), polyurethane (P), textured (T) implant surface (without antibiotic) (Above left). Smooth (S), polyurethane (P) and textured (T) implant surfaces (with antibiotic) (Above right). Preoperative incision markings for submuscular pockets (Below left). Implant surface are placed in the submuscular pocket with sterile forceps (Below right)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The mean number of bacterial colonies over time on surfaces to which local antibiotic treatment has not been applied
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The mean number of bacterial colonies over time on surfaces to which local antibiotic treatment has been applied
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Graph showing statistical comparisons with error bars, without local antibiotic therapy (Groups 1-2-3). Small values could not be shown in the graph due to large differences between the data. Therefore, the data were made suitable for display by using the standardization method
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Graph showing statistical comparisons with error bars, without local antibiotic therapy (Groups 4-5-6). Small values could not be shown in the graph due to large differences between the data. Therefore, the data were made suitable for display by using the standardization method
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Graph showing statistical comparisons of groups without local antibiotics and with local antibiotics according to hours with error bars. Small values could not be shown in the graph due to large differences between the data. Therefore, the data were made suitable for display by using the standardization method

References

    1. Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K (2015) Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 42(5):532–543. 10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chong SJ, Deva AK (2015) Understanding the etiology and prevention of capsular contracture: translating science into practice. Clin Plast Surg 42(4):427–436. 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.007 - PubMed
    1. Gampper TJ, Khoury H, Gottlieb W, Morgan RF (2007) Silicone gel implants in breast augmentation and reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 59(5):581–590. 10.1097/01.sap.0000258970.31562.5d - PubMed
    1. Adams WP Jr (2009) Capsular contracture: What is it? What causes it? How can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg 36(1):119–126. 10.1016/j.cps.2008.08.007 - PubMed
    1. Ajdic D, Zoghbi Y, Gerth D, Panthaki ZJ, Thaller S (2016) The relationship of bacterial biofilms and capsular contracture in breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 36(3):297–309. 10.1093/asj/sjv177 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources