Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;26(7):675-680.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02071-0. Epub 2024 May 28.

Role of Cyp2c19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Affiliations
Review

Role of Cyp2c19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Manu Rajachandran et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Identification of a reliable discriminatory test to accurately stratify patient responses to antiplatelet therapy following coronary revascularization has become increasingly desirable to optimize therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Recent findings: The expansion of platelet function testing to include genotype assessment has been an evolutionary journey, initially fraught with confounding results. However, more recent and rigorous data analysis suggests that genotype testing- guided, tailored antiplatelet therapy may hold promise in optimizing treatment of patients after coronary intervention. Current evidence increasingly supports the use of genotype guided CYP2C19 testing to better match the post coronary intervention patient with the most efficacious and least risky antiplatelet inhibitor. The risk stratification of poor, intermediate, and good metabolizers of these drugs with such testing promises to yield clinical dividends in terms of morbidity, mortality and cost control, in this growing patient population.

Keywords: Genotype-guided therapy; High on-treatment platelet reactivity; Platelet function testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
    1. Hwang D, Kim HL, Koo BK, Rhee TM, Yang DW, Seo Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the HOST-EXAM study. JACC Asia. 2023;3(2):198–207. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. van den Broek WWA, van Paassen JG, Gimbel ME, Deneer VHM, Ten Berg JM, Vreman RA. Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor in patients of 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022;9(1):76–84. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Chen YW, Liao YJ, Chang WC, Hsiao TH, Lin CH, Hsu CY, et al. CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles predicts clinical outcomes in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting receiving clopidogrel. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;22(9):994184. - DOI
    1. Adamski P, Buszko K, Sikora J, et al. Metabolism of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11746. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Biswas M, Kali MSK, Biswas TK, Ibrahim B. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events of CYP2C19 loss-of-function genotype guided prasugrel/ticagrelor vs clopidogrel therapy for acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Platelets. 2021;32(5):591–600. - PubMed - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources