Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 14:6:1381020.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1381020. eCollection 2024.

Quantifying lumbar sagittal plane kinematics using a wrist-worn inertial measurement unit

Affiliations

Quantifying lumbar sagittal plane kinematics using a wrist-worn inertial measurement unit

Bernard X W Liew et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Wearable sensors like inertial measurement units (IMUs), and those available as smartphone or smartwatch applications, are increasingly used to quantify lumbar mobility. Currently, wearable sensors have to be placed on the back to measure lumbar mobility, meaning it cannot be used in unsupervised environments. This study aims to compare lumbar sagittal plane angles quantified from a wrist-worn against that of a lumbar-worn sensor. Twenty healthy participants were recruited. An IMU was placed on the right wrist and the L3 spinal level. Participants had to position their right forearm on their abdomen, parallel to the floor. Three sets of three consecutive repetitions of flexion, and extension were formed. Linear mixed models were performed to quantify the effect of region (lumbar vs. wrist) on six outcomes [minimum, maximum, range of motion (ROM) of flexion and extension]. Only flexion ROM was significantly different between the wrist and lumbar sensors, with a mean of 4.54° (95% CI = 1.82°-7.27°). Across all outcomes, the maximal difference between a wrist-worn and lumbar-worn sensor was <8°. A wrist-worn IMU sensor could be used to measure gross lumbar sagittal plane mobility in place of a lumbar-worn IMU. This may be useful for remote monitoring during rehabilitation.

Keywords: biomechanics; mobility; range of motion; spine; wearable sensor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) A posterior view showing the position of the lumbar and pelvis sensors, (B) an anterior view showing the position of the wrist sensor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Beta coefficients with 95% confidence interval, of the linear mixed models for (A) minimum lumbar flexion angle, (B) maximum lumbar flexion angle, (C) range of motion of lumbar flexion, (D) minimum lumbar extension angle, (E) maximum lumbar extension angle, and (F) range of motion of lumbar extension.

References

    1. Coenen P, Kingma I, Boot CR, Bongers PM, van Dieën JH. Cumulative mechanical low-back load at work is a determinant of low-back pain. Occup Environ Med. (2014) 71:332–7. 10.1136/oemed-2013-101862 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karayannis NV, Jull GA, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. Psychological features and their relationship to movement-based subgroups in people living with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2018) 99:121–8. 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.493 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karayannis NV, Jull GA, Hodges PW. Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2012) 13:24. 10.1186/1471-2474-13-24 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sahrmann S, Azevedo DC, Dillen LV. Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes. Braz J Phys Ther. (2017) 21:391–9. 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.08.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Sullivan PB, Caneiro JP, O'Keeffe M, Smith A, Dankaerts W, Fersum K, et al. Cognitive functional therapy: an integrated behavioral approach for the targeted management of disabling low back pain. Phys Ther. (2018) 98:408–23. 10.1093/ptj/pzy022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources