Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59194.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.59194. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Trends in Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction

Affiliations

Trends in Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction

Shahnur Ahmed et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background and objective Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is emerging as a useful adjunct after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), leading to a decrease in lymphedema rates from 30 to 3-13% in breast cancer patients. ILR requires coordination between two surgical specialties for oncologic ALND and microsurgical axillary lymphatic anastomosis. This study aimed to assess the trends in the frequency of ILR performed after ALND at our institution. Methods This study involved a retrospective review of breast cancer patients undergoing ALND with and without ILR at our institution (2017-2022). Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments received were gathered and analyzed. Results A total of 316 patients underwent ALND at our institution and 30.7% (97/316) of them received ILR. There was no significant difference in clinical breast cancer stages between patients who underwent ALND with or without ILR (p>0.05). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 51.1% (112/219) of patients with ALND only compared to 60.8% (59/97) of patients who underwent ALND with ILR (p=0.09). All patients received adjuvant radiation therapy. ILR was performed after ALND in 4.2% (2/47) in 2017, 25.8% (3/58) in 2018, 17.6% (12/68) in 2019, 35% (21/60) in 2020, 56.9% (41/72) in 2021, and 54.5% (6/11) in 2022. When comparing the first year of the ILR program with the last year of the study period, the odds ratio of receiving ILR after ALND was 1.8 (p=0.04). Conclusions The frequency of performing ILR after ALND in breast cancer patients at our institution witnessed a substantial increase during the study period. The implementation of an established ILR program at an institution can increase procedure uptake accompanied by continued growth in utilization.

Keywords: alnd: - axillary lymph node dissection; axillary lymphadenectomy; breast cancer related lymphedema; breast lymphedema; lympho-venous-anastomosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of ILR after ALND by year (rates of ILR are demonstrated in percentages)
*Incomplete year ALND: axillary lymph node dissection; ILR: immediate lymphatic reconstruction
Figure 2
Figure 2. Yearly trend of ILR after ALND by percentage
*Incomplete year ALND: axillary lymph node dissection; ILR: immediate lymphatic reconstruction

References

    1. Risk factors for lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Norman SA, Localio AR, Kallan MJ, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2734–2746. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lymphedema incidence after axillary lymph node dissection: quantifying the impact of radiation and the lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach. Johnson AR, Kimball S, Epstein S, et al. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;82:0–41. - PubMed
    1. Single institution experience with lymphatic microsurgical preventive healing approach (LYMPHA) for the primary prevention of lymphedema. Feldman S, Bansil H, Ascherman J, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3296–3301. - PubMed
    1. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction. Johnson AR, Singhal D. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:750–757. - PubMed
    1. Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for primary surgical prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: over 4 years follow-up. Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F, et al. Microsurgery. 2014;34:421–424. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources