Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD016043.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016043.

Approaches for delivery of refractive and optical care services in community and primary care settings

Affiliations

Approaches for delivery of refractive and optical care services in community and primary care settings

Valerie Umaefulam et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Uncorrected refractive error is a leading cause of vision impairment which, in most cases, can be managed with the appropriate spectacle correction. In 2021, the World Health Assembly endorsed a global target of a 40-percentage-point increase in effective coverage of refractive error by 2030. To achieve this global target, equitable access to refractive and optical services within community and primary care settings needs to be strengthened. This review will inform the development of technical guidance to support improvements in the testing and correction of refractive error among World Health Organization (WHO) member states.

Objectives: To determine the range of approaches for delivery of refractive and optical care services in community and primary care settings, and the methods employed for their evaluation.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health databases, grey literature, and annual reports and websites of relevant organizations involved in eye-care delivery from January 2002 to November 2022 to identify approaches for refractive and optical service delivery.

Selection criteria: We included observational and interventional studies, reviews, and reports from relevant organizations related to delivering refractive services and optical services for preschool and school-aged children and adults in community and primary care settings published between January 2002 and November 2022. We searched for studies and reports published within the last 20 years because vision impairment due to uncorrected refractive error has only recently become a public health and eye health priority, therefore we did not expect to find much relevant literature until after 2002.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors screened titles, abstracts and full texts, and extracted data. We resolved any discrepancies through discussion. We synthesized data, and presented results as tables, figures, and case studies. This project was led by the World Health Organization (WHO) Vision and Eye Care Programme.

Main results: We identified 175 studies from searches of databases and grey literature, 146 records from company reports, and 81 records from website searches of relevant organizations that matched our inclusion criteria. Delivery approaches for refractive and optical services in community care included school-based, pharmacy, and outreach models, whereas primary care approaches comprised vision centre, health centre, and a combination of vision or health centre and door-to-door delivery. In community care, school-based and outreach approaches were predominant, while in primary care, a vision-centre approach was mainly used. In the WHO African region, the school-based and outreach approaches were mainly reported while, in the Americas, the outreach approach was mostly used. Very few approaches for service delivery were reported in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region. Prominent gaps exist in the evaluation of the approaches, and few studies attempted to evaluate the approaches for delivery of refractive and optical care services.

Authors' conclusions: We comprehensively describe a range of approaches for delivery of refractive and optical services in community and primary care. Further evaluation of their effectiveness will better inform the application of these service-delivery approaches. The study outcomes will help guide WHO member states in strengthening refractive and optical services at community and primary care levels.

Funding: This scoping review was supported by the Vision and Eye care Programme, World Health Organization and ATscale Global Partnership.

Registration: The protocol of this scoping review was published in the Open Source Framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Valerie Umaefulam: no conflict of interest Safi Sare: no conflict of interest Gareth Lingham: no conflict of interest Iris Gordon: no conflict of interest Andreas Mueller: no conflict of interest Neha S. Krishnam: no conflict of interest Vera L Alves Carneiro: no conflict of interest Mitasha Yu: no conflict of interest Jennifer R Evans is an investigator of one of the included studies [72] Stuart Keel: no conflict of interest

Figures

1
1
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram
2
2
Figure 2. Evidence map of approaches for service delivery to provide refractive and optical services. Each square represents the case in which a single included study utilised or evaluated an approach (rows) against a service provided (columns). The study type is shown in different colours.
3
3
Figure 3. Stacked bar chart of approaches for refractive and optical service delivery across geographic locations from all resources. Each bar represents the number of included resources per approach for service delivery and the total number of refractive and optical services per approach per setting (primary or community care) in that region (x‐axis) and the WHO region (y‐axis). The bars are colour‐coded to the service delivery approach.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Report of the 2030 targets on effective coverage of eye care. Available from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058002 2022. [WEBSITE: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240058002 (accessed 8 Oct 2023)]
    1. Lamoureux EL, Wang J, Aung T, Saw SM, Wong TY. Myopia and quality of life: The Singapore Malay Eye Study (SiMES). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2008;49(13):4469. - PubMed
    1. Rose K, Harper R, Tromans C, Waterman C, Goldberg D, Haggerty C, et al. Quality of life in myopia. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2000;84(9):1031-4. [DOI: 10.1136/bjo.84.9.1031] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma Y, Congdon N, Shi Y, Hogg R, Medina A, Boswell M, et al. Effect of a Local Vision Care Center on Eyeglasses Use and School Performance in Rural China: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmology 2018;136(7):731-737. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1329] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nie J, Pang X, Wang L, Rozelle S, Sylvia S. Seeing Is believing: experimental evidence on the impact of eyeglasses on academic performance, aspirations, and dropout among junior high school students in rural China. Economic Development and Cultural Change 2019;68(2):335-55.

Publication types