Machine Learning Model for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinically Node Positive Breast Cancer Based on Peritumoral Ultrasound Radiomics and SHAP Feature Analysis
- PMID: 38808580
- DOI: 10.1002/jum.16483
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinically Node Positive Breast Cancer Based on Peritumoral Ultrasound Radiomics and SHAP Feature Analysis
Erratum in
-
Correction to "Machine Learning Model for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinically Node Positive Breast Cancer Based on Peritumoral Ultrasound Radiomics and SHAP Feature Analysis".J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Jul;44(7):1323. doi: 10.1002/jum.16692. Epub 2025 Apr 5. J Ultrasound Med. 2025. PMID: 40186411 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: This study seeks to construct a machine learning model that merges clinical characteristics with ultrasound radiomic analysis-encompassing both the intratumoral and peritumoral-to predict the status of axillary lymph nodes in patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Methods: The study employed retrospective methods, collecting clinical information, ultrasound data, and postoperative pathological results from 321 breast cancer patients (including 224 in the training group and 97 in the validation group). Through correlation analysis, univariate analysis, and Lasso regression analysis, independent risk factors related to axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer were identified from conventional ultrasound and immunohistochemical indicators, and a clinical feature model was constructed. Additionally, features were extracted from ultrasound images of the intratumoral and its 1-5 mm peritumoral to establish a radiomics feature formula. Furthermore, by combining clinical features and ultrasound radiomics features, six machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbors) were compared for diagnostic efficacy, and constructing a joint prediction model based on the optimal ML algorithm. The use of Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) enhanced the visualization and interpretability of the model during the diagnostic process.
Results: Among the 321 breast cancer patients, 121 had axillary lymph node metastasis, and 200 did not. The clinical feature model had an AUC of 0.779 and 0.777 in the training and validation groups, respectively. Radiomics model analysis showed that the model including the Intratumor +3 mm peritumor area had the best diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.847 and 0.844 in the training and validation groups, respectively. The joint prediction model based on the XGBoost algorithm reached AUCs of 0.917 and 0.905 in the training and validation groups, respectively. SHAP analysis indicated that the Rad Score had the highest weight in the prediction model, playing a significant role in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.
Conclusion: The predictive model, which integrates clinical features and radiomic characteristics using the XGBoost algorithm, demonstrates significant diagnostic value for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. This model can provide significant references for preoperative surgical strategy selection and prognosis evaluation for breast cancer patients, helping to reduce postoperative complications and improve long-term survival rates. Additionally, the utilization of SHAP enhancing the global and local interpretability of the model.
Keywords: axillary lymph nodes; breast cancer; intratumor and peritumor regions; radiomics; ultrasound.
© 2024 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Comparative Analysis of Nomogram and Machine Learning Models for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Study on Clinically and Ultrasound-Negative Axillary Cases Across Two Centers.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2025 Mar;51(3):463-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Dec 3. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2025. PMID: 39627056
-
Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis with short diameter less than 8 mm in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on radiomics.Cancer Imaging. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00803-7. Cancer Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39548590 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Prediction Accuracy of Residual Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Node-Positive Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Radiomics Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Clip Locations Using the SHAP Method.Acad Radiol. 2025 Apr;32(4):1827-1837. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.039. Epub 2024 Nov 9. Acad Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39523140
-
Deep learning-based breast MRI for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Imaging. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00863-3. Cancer Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40165212 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative ultrasound radiomics analysis to evaluate lymph nodes in patients with cancer: a systematic review.Ultraschall Med. 2024 Dec;45(6):586-596. doi: 10.1055/a-2275-8342. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Ultraschall Med. 2024. PMID: 38663433 English.
Cited by
-
Machine-learning models for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: Integrating automated breast volume scanning intra-tumoral, peri-tumoral features, and clinical information.Digit Health. 2025 Apr 1;11:20552076251332738. doi: 10.1177/20552076251332738. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40177119 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling the risk of axillary lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A retrospective study.Mol Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 23;23(4):89. doi: 10.3892/mco.2025.2884. eCollection 2025 Oct. Mol Clin Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40757240 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing breast cancer ultrasound diagnosis: a comparative study of AI model performance and image resolution.Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 6;15:1536365. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1536365. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40599864 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.
-
- Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10‐year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. JAMA 2017; 318:918. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11470.
-
- Luparia A, Campanino P, Cotti R, et al. Role of axillary ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients affected by breast carcinoma. Radiol Med 2010; 115:225–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0465-8.
-
- Yu Y, Tan Y, Xie C, et al. Development and validation of a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging radiomics‐based signature to predict axillary lymph node metastasis and disease‐free survival in patients with early‐stage breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2028086. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28086.
-
- Vasigh M, Meshkati Yazd SM, Karoobi M, Hajebi R, Yazdankhah KA. Does ultrasound evaluation of the axilla increase the rate of axillary lymph node dissection in early stage clinically node negative breast cancer patients? BMC Surg 2022; 22:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01530-1.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- ZZZC2023040/Shihezi University School-Level Research Program
- ZZZC2023035/Shihezi University School-Level Research Program
- ZP2023080/Graduate Innovation Program at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University
- 2020-PT330-003/Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- 2022CB002-04/Corps Financial Science and Technology Program
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical