Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2024 Aug;79(2):352-361.
doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12238. Epub 2024 May 29.

Growth charts for use at birth and in the neonatal period: Recommendations of the French Neonatal Society

Isabelle Guellec  1   2 , Laure Simon  3 , Christophe Vayssiere  4 , Marie-Victoire Senat  5 , Anne Ego  6 , Jennifer Zeitlin  2 , Damien Subtil  7 , Eric Verspyck  8 , Alexandre Lapillonne  9 , Jean-Christophe Roze  10 , Olivier Claris  11 , Jean-Charles Picaud  11 , Isabelle Monier  2 , Gascoin Geraldine  12
Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Growth charts for use at birth and in the neonatal period: Recommendations of the French Neonatal Society

Isabelle Guellec et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: The use of different growth charts can lead to confusion in discussions between professionals. There are obstetric charts (of fetal growth) and neonatal charts (of measurements at birth and of postnatal growth). These charts can be descriptive (derived from an unselected population) or prescriptive (derived from of a population at low risk and with optimal conditions for growth).

Objectives: (1) To describe available charts for infants at birth and in the neonatal period and compare them, and (2) to recommend one or more charts for use in neonatology in France.

Methods: Bibliographic research was conducted on MEDLINE and completed by the guidelines of professional societies.

Results: Antenatal information about fetal growth restriction or fetuses identified as small-for-gestational-age using Intrauterine charts must be integrated into the identification of newborns at risk, but the use of Intrauterine charts to evaluate birthweight is not recommended to allow consistency with postnatal charts used in neonatal practice. Z-score variations using the updated Fenton postnatal charts are the most appropriate for the assessment of birthweight and postnatal growth for infants born preterm. These charts are sex-specific, include the three measurements (length, weight, and head circumference) and enable longitudinal follow-up of growth up to 50 weeks of corrected age and are linked to the World Health Organization charts at term. The French Audipog charts, although are individualized, accessible online and can be used in maternity units to evaluate birthweight for term infants, but do not allow the follow-up of postnatal growth, while Fenton charts may be used to evaluate birthweight and postnatal growth in the first month for hospitalized term infants.

Conclusion: The updated Fenton charts are the neonatal charts that best suit the objectives of pediatricians in France for monitoring the growth of preterm newborns. The use of the Audipog charts at term remains an alternative in maternity wards, while Fenton charts can be used for hospitalized term newborns.

Keywords: birthweight postnatal growth; fetal growth; newborn; preterm infant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Monier I, Hocquette A, Zeitlin J. Review of the literature on intrauterine and birthweight charts. Gynecol Obstetr Fertil Senol. 2023;51(5):256‐269.
    1. Eide MG, Oyen N, Skjaerven R, Nilsen ST, Bjerkedal T, Tell GS. Size at birth and gestational age as predictors of adult height and weight. Epidemiology. 2005;16(2):175‐181.
    1. Sicard M, Nusinovici S, Hanf M, et al. Fetal and postnatal head circumference growth: synergetic factors for neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age for preterm infants. Neonatology. 2017;112(2):122‐129.
    1. Hutcheon JA, Platt RW. The missing data problem in birth weight percentiles and thresholds for “small‐for‐gestational‐age”. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(7):786‐792.
    1. Vayssière C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra‐uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:10‐18.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources