Current state of minimally invasive general surgical practice in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the laparoscopic procedures performed and outcomes
- PMID: 38809177
- DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12195
Current state of minimally invasive general surgical practice in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the laparoscopic procedures performed and outcomes
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopy and robotics, has significantly improved general surgical (GS) practice globally. While robot-assisted GS practice is yet to be adopted in the majority of Africa, laparoscopy has been utilized to improve surgical outcomes. This study aims to review the laparoscopic GS procedures (LGSPs) performed and evaluate outcomes such as conversion to open surgery, morbidity, and mortality in Africa.
Methods: Four databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, WoS, and AJOL) were searched, identifying 8022 publications. Following screening, 40 studies across Africa that reported LGSPs (n ≥ 2) performed and outcomes met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis conducted using R statistical software estimated the pooled prevalences with the 95% CI of conversion, morbidity, and mortality.
Results: A total of 6381 procedures performed in 15 African countries were analyzed in this study. Majority, 72.89%, of the procedures were performed in Senegal, South Africa, and Nigeria. The major procedures performed were cholecystectomy (37.09%), appendicectomy (33.36%), and diagnostic laparoscopy (9.98%). The meta-analysis revealed a conversion rate of 5% [95% CI: 4, 7]. Adhesion (28.13%), hemorrhage (16.67%), technical difficultly (12.50%), and equipment failure (11.46%) were the predominant indications for conversion. Surgical site infection (42.75%) was the major cause of morbidity. The prevalences of morbidity and mortality were 7% [95% CI: 5, 10] and 0.12% [95% CI: 0, 0.29], respectively.
Conclusion: A wide range of basic and advanced LGSPs were performed. The outcomes obtained indicate successful implementation of the laparoscopic approach. Importantly, this study serves as a foundational work for further research on minimally invasive surgery in Africa.
Keywords: Africa; general surgery; laparoscopic; laparoscopy; minimal access; minimally invasive.
© 2024 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).
References
REFERENCES
-
- Alsammani, M. B., M. A. A. Alhaj, and A. A. M. Alawad. 2015 “Preliminary Experience with Laparoscopic Surgery in Sudanese Low‐Resourced Teaching Hospital.” Medicine Journal 2(6): 94–98.
-
- Siddaiah‐Subramanya, Manjunath, Kor Tiang, and Masimba Nyandowe. 2017. “A New Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Progress and Development of Major Technical Innovations in General Surgery over the Last Decade.” Surgery Journal 3(4): e163–e166. https://doi.org/10.1055/s‐0037‐1608651.
-
- Liu, Rong, Qu Liu, and Zizheng Wang. 2021. “Worldwide Diffusion of Robotic Approach in General Surgery.” Updates in Surgery 73(3): 795–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304‐020‐00914‐3.
-
- Oyebamiji, Tunde A. 2020. “Robotic Surgery in Nigeria: An Uncertain Possibility.” International Surgery Journal 7(11): 3876–3879. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349‐2902.isj20204713.
-
- Ndong, Abdourahmane, Adja C. Diallo, Armaun D. Rouhi, Mohamed L. Diao, William Yi, Jacques N. Tendeng, Noel N. Williams, Mamadou Cissé, Kristoffel R. Dumon, and Ibrahima Konaté. 2023. “Evolution of Laparoscopic Surgery in a Sub‐Saharan African Country: A 30‐year Literature Review in Senegal.” Surgical Endoscopy 37(8): 6548–6557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464‐023‐10192‐w.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
