Questionnaires assessing knowledge and beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions are potentially suitable for use, but further research is needed: a systematic review
- PMID: 38810841
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111398
Questionnaires assessing knowledge and beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions are potentially suitable for use, but further research is needed: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the measurement properties of Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for knowledge and/or beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions.
Study design and setting: A systematic review was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO - ID: CRD42022303111. Electronic databases, reference lists, forward citation tracking, and contact with experts were used to identify studies. Eligible studies were reports developing or assessing a measurement property of a PROM measuring musculoskeletal condition specific-knowledge and/or beliefs. We assessed the methodological quality and measurement properties of included studies. A modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence for each PROM.
Results: The literature search was performed from inception to 11th September 2023. Sixty records were included, reporting 290 individual studies, and provided information on 25 PROMs. Five PROMs presented sufficient structural validity, three presented sufficient cross-cultural validity, ten presented sufficient reliability, three presented sufficient criterion validity, six presented sufficient hypothesis-testing, and four presented sufficient responsiveness. No PROM presented sufficient evidence for content validity, internal consistency, and measurement error. Based on the available evidence, no PROM was classified as suitable for use according to the COSMIN recommendations. Twenty-four PROMs are potentially suitable for use, and one PROM is not recommended for use.
Conclusion: No PROM designed to assess knowledge and/or beliefs about musculoskeletal conditions meets the COSMIN criteria of suitable for use. Most PROMs identified in this systematic review were considered as potentially suitable for use and need further high-quality research to assess their measurement properties.
Keywords: Beliefs; Knowledge; Musculoskeletal condition; Patient-reported outcome measures; Psychometrics; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest There are no competing interests for any author.
Similar articles
-
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111600. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34042993 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Maternal Postpartum Depression Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline: A Systematic Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14885. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35749118 Free PMC article.
-
The suitability of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in people with diabetes: a systematic review using COSMIN methods.Diabetologia. 2021 Jun;64(6):1213-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05382-x. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Diabetologia. 2021. PMID: 33528625 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8. BJU Int. 2018. PMID: 29726085 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review of Measure Development and Measurement Properties.JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;158(8):900-911. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2260. JAMA Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 35731537 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources