Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 29;24(1):1439.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18885-0.

Does integrated health management within a county medical consortium improve rural type 2 diabetic patients' self-management behavior and quality of life? An empirical analysis from Eastern China

Mingyao Peng #  1 , Li Li #  2 , Xinyi Shi  1 , Zhonghua Wang  3   4   5
Affiliations

Does integrated health management within a county medical consortium improve rural type 2 diabetic patients' self-management behavior and quality of life? An empirical analysis from Eastern China

Mingyao Peng et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Levels of self-management behaviors (SMB) and quality of life (QoL) are suboptimal in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), especially in rural China. Integrated health management within a county medical consortium, featuring multi-level teams of doctors, nurses, and other professionals offering follow-up services such as check-ups, assessments, treatment, and health education, is promising in improving this. This study aimed to assess the effect of integrated health management within a county medical consortium on the SMB and QoL of rural T2D patients in China.

Methods: Based on a survey conducted on the county medical consortium in Eastern China, this study initially employed propensity score matching (PSM), a nonparametric technique, to precisely estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) of integrated health management on SMB and QoL in rural T2D patients. Subsequently, quantile regression was also performed to estimate the relationship between the implementation of integrated health management, sociodemographic factors, follow-up services (offered during integrated health management) and both SMB and QoL.

Results: The ATT values for SMB and QoL, representing the net effect of integrated health management within a county medical consortium on SMB and QoL, were significantly positive. They ranged from 4.34 to 4.67 for SMB and from 0.89 to 1.06 for QoL, respectively, based on the four different PSM modalities. The results of quantile regression also revealed a statistically significant positive association between the implementation of integrated health management and both SMB (coef. = 4.15) and QoL (coef. = 1.54). These findings suggest that integrated health management within a county medical consortium can effectively improve SMB and QoL in rural T2D patients. Furthermore, frequency of follow-up service and health behavior guidance were positively associated with SMB and QoL. Conversely, on-call follow-up services, medication guidance and follow-up services at medical institutions were negatively correlated with SMB or QoL.

Conclusions: The study highlights the effectiveness of integrated health management within a county medical consortium in improving SMB and QoL among individuals with T2D in rural China. The findings offer invaluable insights for the advancement of chronic disease management in rural areas of developing countries.

Keywords: Integrated health management; Medical consortium; Quality of life; Self-management behavior; Type 2 Diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Propensity score histogram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standardized percentage bias across covariates (1:4 nearest neighbor matching)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2021 | IDF Diabetes Atlas. https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/. Accessed 5 Mar 2023.
    1. Zhong X, Tanasugarn C, Fisher EB, Krudsood S, Nityasuddhi D. Awareness and practices of self-management and influence factors among individuals with type 2 diabetes in urban community settings in Anhui Province, China. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2011; 42:185–6, 184, 187–196. - PubMed
    1. Huang M, Zhao R, Li S, Jiang X. Self-management behavior in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey in western urban China. PLoS One. 2014;9:e95138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095138. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azylina G, Chang Ching T, Cheah WL. Predictors of Diabetes Self-Management among Type 2 Diabetes Patients. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:9158943. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whittemore R, Melkus GD, Grey M. Metabolic control, self-management and psychosocial adjustment in women with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:195–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00937.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types