Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 29;19(1):66.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02455-0.

Uncertainty estimation- and attention-based semi-supervised models for automatically delineate clinical target volume in CBCT images of breast cancer

Affiliations

Uncertainty estimation- and attention-based semi-supervised models for automatically delineate clinical target volume in CBCT images of breast cancer

Ziyi Wang et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) of CBCT images can observe the changes of CTV during patients' radiotherapy, and lay a foundation for the subsequent implementation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART). However, segmentation is challenging due to the poor quality of CBCT images and difficulty in obtaining target volumes. An uncertainty estimation- and attention-based semi-supervised model called residual convolutional block attention-uncertainty aware mean teacher (RCBA-UAMT) was proposed to delineate the CTV in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of breast cancer automatically.

Methods: A total of 60 patients who undergone radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery were enrolled in this study, which involved 60 planning CTs and 380 CBCTs. RCBA-UAMT was proposed by integrating residual and attention modules in the backbone network 3D UNet. The attention module can adjust channel and spatial weights of the extracted image features. The proposed design can train the model and segment CBCT images with a small amount of labeled data (5%, 10%, and 20%) and a large amount of unlabeled data. Four types of evaluation metrics, namely, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard, average surface distance (ASD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (95HD), are used to assess the model segmentation performance quantitatively.

Results: The proposed method achieved average DSC, Jaccard, 95HD, and ASD of 82%, 70%, 8.93, and 1.49 mm for CTV delineation on CBCT images of breast cancer, respectively. Compared with the three classical methods of mean teacher, uncertainty-aware mean-teacher and uncertainty rectified pyramid consistency, DSC and Jaccard increased by 7.89-9.33% and 14.75-16.67%, respectively, while 95HD and ASD decreased by 33.16-67.81% and 36.05-75.57%, respectively. The comparative experiment results of the labeled data with different proportions (5%, 10% and 20%) showed significant differences in the DSC, Jaccard, and 95HD evaluation indexes in the labeled data with 5% versus 10% and 5% versus 20%. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in the labeled data with 10% versus 20% among all evaluation indexes. Therefore, we can use only 10% labeled data to achieve the experimental objective.

Conclusions: Using the proposed RCBA-UAMT, the CTV of breast cancer CBCT images can be delineated reliably with a small amount of labeled data. These delineated images can be used to observe the changes in CTV and lay the foundation for the follow-up implementation of ART.

Keywords: Automatic delineation; Breast cancer; Cone-beam computed tomography, clinical target volume; Semi-supervised learning; Uncertainty estimation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of our RCBA-UAMT framework
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Architecture of residual convolutional block attention 3D UNet, which is used as the backbone network in the RCBA-UAMT. b Architecture of 3D convolutional block attention module
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Quantitative analysis of each evaluation index of the four SSL methods was performed under 10% labeled data, with the columns representing the mean and the top representing the standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proposed RCBA-UAMT model visual results compared with different semi-supervised segmentation models. Red represent GT, blue is MT, yellow is UAMT, green is URPC, and purple is ours method. Each row shows a different sample

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48. - PubMed
    1. Macchia G, Cilla S, Buwenge M, Zamagni A, Ammendolia I, Zamagni C, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concomitant boost after breast conserving surgery: a Phase I-II trial. Breast Cancer: Targets Ther. 2020;12:243–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boda-Heggemann J, Lohr F, Wenz F, Flentje M, Guckenberger M. kV cone-beam CT-based IGRT: a clinical review. Strahlenther Onkol. 2011;187(5):284–91. - PubMed
    1. Pang EPP, Knight K, Fan Q, Tan SXF, Ang KW, Master Z, et al. Analysis of intra-fraction prostate motion and derivation of duration-dependent margins for radiotherapy using real-time 4D ultrasound. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018;5:102–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Intven MPW, de Mol van Otterloo SR, Mook S, Doornaert PAH, de Groot-van Breugel EN, Sikkes GG, et al. Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer; feasibility of the workflow on a 1.5T MR-linac: clinical implementation and initial experience. Radiother Oncol. 2021; 154:172–178. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources