Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 29;2024(3):hoae029.
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae029. eCollection 2024.

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement

Collaborators, Affiliations

Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement

G Condous et al. Hum Reprod Open. .

Abstract

The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group, the European Endometriosis League (EEL), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) elected an international, multidisciplinary panel of gynecological surgeons, sonographers, and radiologists, including a steering committee, which searched the literature for relevant articles in order to review the literature and provide evidence-based and clinically relevant statements on the use of imaging techniques for non-invasive diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis. Preliminary statements were drafted based on review of the relevant literature. Following two rounds of revisions and voting orchestrated by chairs of the participating societies, consensus statements were finalized. A final version of the document was then resubmitted to the society chairs for approval. Twenty statements were drafted, of which 14 reached strong and three moderate agreement after the first voting round. The remaining three statements were discussed by all members of the steering committee and society chairs and rephrased, followed by an additional round of voting. At the conclusion of the process, 14 statements had strong and five statements moderate agreement, with one statement left in equipoise. This consensus work aims to guide clinicians involved in treating women with suspected endometriosis during patient assessment, counselling, and planning of surgical treatment strategies.

Keywords: MRI; collaboration; deep endometriosis; non-invasive diagnosis; transvaginal ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.C. declares receipt of an MRFF grant to develop AI for endometriosis imaging, honoraria from Samsung and GE healthcare, is a member of the ISUOG Board of trustees, and is the WFUMB President-Elect. E.S. declares grants from National Institute for Health Research, Rosetrees Trust and Barts and the London Charity for multicenter trials on endometriosis and hysterectomy, book royalties (for the book entitled ‘Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecological Practice’) from De Gruyter, consulting fees from Hologic; honoraria from Medtronic, Hologic, Karl Storz, Intuitive, Arthrex, and Olympus; and is a member of the Medicines for Women’s Health Expert Advisory Group of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The other authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Process for development of Consensus Statement on the use of non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis and classification of pelvic deep endometriosis.

References

    1. Abrao MS, Andres MP, Gingold JA, Rius M, Neto JS, Goncalves MO, Giovanni AD, Malzoni M, Carmona F.. Preoperative ultrasound scoring of endometriosis by AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification is concordant with laparoscopic surgical findings and distinguishes early from advanced stages. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023;30:363–373. - PubMed
    1. Abrao MS, Andres MP, Miller CE, Gingold JA, Rius M, Neto JS, Carmona F.. AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification: an anatomy-based surgical complexity score. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021;28:1941–1950.e1. - PubMed
    1. Abrao MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C.. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21:329–339. - PubMed
    1. Adamson GD, Pasta DJ.. Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1609–1615. - PubMed
    1. Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, Laufer MR, Leyland N, Missmer SA, Singh SS, Taylor HS.. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:354.e1–12. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources